BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15372618)

  • 1. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
    Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-Stage sampling designs for gene association studies.
    Thomas D; Xie R; Gebregziabher M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):401-14. PubMed ID: 15543639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of single SNPs, haplotypes, and whole-genome LD maps on accuracy of association mapping.
    Maniatis N; Collins A; Morton NE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 17285621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis and application of SNP and haplotype in the human genome].
    Li J; Pan YC; Li YX; Shi TL
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 32(8):879-89. PubMed ID: 16231744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine mapping of disease genes using tagging SNPs.
    Sjölander A; Hössjer O; Hartman LW; Humphreys K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):815-27. PubMed ID: 17587339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Haplotype sharing analysis with SNPs in candidate genes: the Genetic Analysis Workshop 12 example.
    Fischer C; Beckmann L; Majoram P; te Meerman G; Chang-Claude J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 12508257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of SNP subsets for association studies in candidate genes: comparison of the power of different strategies to detect single disease susceptibility locus effects.
    Cousin E; Deleuze JF; Genin E
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():20. PubMed ID: 16597333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].
    Heid IM; Lamina C; Bongardt F; Fischer G; Klopp N; Huth C; Küchenhoff H; Kronenberg F; Wichmann HE; Illig T
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Aug; 67 Suppl 1():S132-6. PubMed ID: 16032531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNP selection for association studies: maximizing power across SNP choice and study size.
    Pardi F; Lewis CM; Whittaker JC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Nov; 69(Pt 6):733-46. PubMed ID: 16266411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fine mapping functional sites or regions from case-control data using haplotypes of multiple linked SNPs.
    Cheng R; Ma JZ; Elston RC; Li MD
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 69(Pt 1):102-12. PubMed ID: 15638831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.
    Horne BD; Camp NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 14691953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The usefulness of different density SNP maps for disease association studies of common variants.
    Wang WY; Todd JA
    Hum Mol Genet; 2003 Dec; 12(23):3145-9. PubMed ID: 14532327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical multilocus methods for disequilibrium analysis in complex traits.
    Ott J; Hoh J
    Hum Mutat; 2001 Apr; 17(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11295826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct analysis of unphased SNP genotype data in population-based association studies via Bayesian partition modelling of haplotypes.
    Morris AP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 15940704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment and implications of linkage disequilibrium in genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite panels.
    Goode EL; Jarvik GP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S72-6. PubMed ID: 16342185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.