156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15372776)
1. Referral charges: a bribe with another name.
Amalorpavanathan J
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 15372776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed restrictions on physician referrals to clinical labs: important areas left unclarified.
Cooney PE
Healthspan; 1992 May; 9(5):3-7. PubMed ID: 10119529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lab's payments to consulting doctor may be Medicare fraud, court rules.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1985 Oct; 15(21):122, 126. PubMed ID: 10300436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medtronic "fusiongate".
Boehm FH
Surg Neurol; 2006 Nov; 66(5):551. PubMed ID: 17084214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lucrative operation: how some doctors turn a $90 profit from a $17 test; physician groups add markup to work done by others, despite ethics concerns; administrative costs cited.
Armstrong D
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Sep; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16224819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. SmithKline settles charges of kickbacks at 3 labs.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):3. PubMed ID: 10304218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory kickbacks to doctors persist despite federal and state investigations.
Schorr B
Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1978 Sep; 58(241):40. PubMed ID: 10238424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two lab chains pay $39.8 million to settle Medicare fraud charges.
Scott L
Mod Healthc; 1993 Sep; 23(38):19. PubMed ID: 10171521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lab discounts. How deep is too deep?
Dechene JC; Howton T
CAP Today; 2000 Mar; 14(3):42-4, 48. PubMed ID: 10788302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tackling corruption in Indian medicine.
Sachan D
Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9905):e23-4. PubMed ID: 24251325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ownership of clinical laboratories by referring physicians: effects on utilization, charges, and profitability.
Scott E; Mitchell JM
Med Care; 1994 Feb; 32(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 8302108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ohio doc with ties to Caremark faces kickback charges.
Burns J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Sep; 24(39):14. PubMed ID: 10136470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Keep conditional referral--let patient fees rule].
Johansson B; Svederberg S
Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(47):3827. PubMed ID: 15609541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. M.D. referrals clarified.
Burda D; Lutz S
Mod Healthc; 1991 Mar; 21(10):2. PubMed ID: 10109615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark II rules and labs; lab fee rates overhaul.
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 May; 34(5):60. PubMed ID: 12024704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Corporate practice, fee splitting and referral fees.
Hogan CE
N Y State Dent J; 2008; 74(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 18982962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Chiropractic clinic offered referral kickbacks.
Freedhoff Y
CMAJ; 2010 Aug; 182(11):E522. PubMed ID: 20566729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [An alternative to compulsory referral].
Johansson B; Svederberg S
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 3-16; 102(1-2):69; author reply 69. PubMed ID: 15707117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical laboratories: myth, fact and future.
Rabkin MT
N Engl J Med; 1978 Feb; 298(8):454-5. PubMed ID: 622123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient referrals.
Stevenson RB
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jul; 138(7):936; author reply 936, 938. PubMed ID: 17606486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
