These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15373251)

  • 21. Field demonstration of visible opacity photographic systems.
    McFarland MJ; Rasmussen SL; Stone DA; Palmer GR; Olivas AC; Wander JD; Spencer M
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Jan; 57(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17269227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology.
    Szot A; Jacobson FL; Munn S; Jazayeri D; Nardell E; Harrison D; Drosten R; Ohno-Machado L; Smeaton LM; Fraser HS
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Feb; 73(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 15036080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deciding when and if digital is right move.
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1995 Sep; Suppl():RF9-12. PubMed ID: 10159499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to improve microscopic images obtained with consumer-type digital cameras.
    Regitnig P; van Paasen R; Tsybrovskyy O
    Histopathology; 2003 May; 42(5):503-8. PubMed ID: 12713629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality.
    Boissin C; Fleming J; Wallis L; Hasselberg M; Laflamme L
    Telemed J E Health; 2015 Nov; 21(11):887-92. PubMed ID: 26076033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Ved H; Baker SP; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7. PubMed ID: 12461264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acquisition and evaluation of radiography images by digital camera.
    Cone SW; Carucci LR; Yu J; Rafiq A; Doarn CR; Merrell RC
    Telemed J E Health; 2005 Apr; 11(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 15857253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interlaced versus progressive readout of television cameras for digital radiographic acquisitions.
    Seibert JA; Barr DH; Borger DJ; Hines HH; Bogren HG
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 6503887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digitizing of radiographs with a roller-type CCD scanner.
    Chen SK; Chiang TC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):719-24. PubMed ID: 9195630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resolution of nidek 3-dx, zeiss, canon, and topcon fundus cameras.
    Boes DA; Clifton BC; Mills RP
    J Glaucoma; 1994; 3(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 19920596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information--a preliminary study.
    Peretz B; Kaffe I; Amir E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Mar; 206(5):E9; discussion 268-9. PubMed ID: 19265830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The absolute sensitivity of digital colour cameras.
    Sigernes F; Dyrland M; Peters N; Lorentzen DA; Svenøe T; Heia K; Chernouss S; Deehr CS; Kosch M
    Opt Express; 2009 Oct; 17(22):20211-20. PubMed ID: 19997245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laser cameras and radiology department design.
    Cory DA; Cohen MD
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Mar; 18(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 10294835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Teleradiology in urology: comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi.
    O'Sullivan DC; Averch TD; Cadeddu JA; Moore RG; Beser N; Breitenbach C; Khazan R; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2216-20. PubMed ID: 9366347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography.
    Holdsworth DW; Gerson RK; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):876-86. PubMed ID: 2233575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.