These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15373523)

  • 1. A comparison of a new affinity column system with a conventional tube LISS-antiglobulin test for antibody detection.
    Shirey RS; Boyd JS; Barrasso C; King KE; Ness PM
    Immunohematology; 1999; 15(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 15373523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of recent techniques for detection of red blood cell antibodies in sera of reference samples, patients, pregnant women, and blood donors.
    de Castilho LM; Pellegrino J; Bechelli AP; Le Pennec PY; Mendes NF
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1996; 10(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 8887003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-ionic-strength saline solution-antiglobulin test (LISS-AGT).
    Walker L
    Immunohematology; 2018 Jun; 34(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 29989420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the performance of four microtube column agglutination systems in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V; Ziener A; Zimmermann R; Glaser A; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
    Transfusion; 1999 Oct; 39(10):1045-50. PubMed ID: 10532596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between a solid-phase low-ionic-strength solution antiglobulin test and conventional low-ionic-strength antiglobulin test: assessment for the screening of antierythrocyte antibodies.
    Guignier F; Domy M; Angue M; Richaud P; Chatelain P
    Vox Sang; 1988; 55(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 3262253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of affinity column technology and LISS tube tests.
    Champagne K; Spruell P; Chen J; Voll L; Schlanser G; Moulds M
    Immunohematology; 1998; 14(4):149-51. PubMed ID: 15377181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polyethylene glycol versus low-ionic-strength solution in pretransfusion testing: a blinded comparison study.
    Shirey RS; Boyd JS; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 1994 May; 34(5):368-70. PubMed ID: 8191557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tube and column agglutination technology for autocontrol testing.
    Courtney JE; Vincent JL; Indrikovs AJ
    Immunohematology; 2001; 17(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 15373592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V; Kohnhäuser T; Zimmermann R; Ringwald J; Strasser E; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
    Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
    Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
    Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of micro column technology with conventional tube methods for antibody detection.
    Garg S; Saini N; Bedi RK; Basu S
    J Lab Physicians; 2017; 9(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 28367023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The gel test: sensitivity and specificity for unexpected antibodies to blood group antigens.
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Knafl PC
    Immunohematology; 1997; 13(4):132-5. PubMed ID: 15387766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the routine use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as an enhancement medium.
    Barrett VJ; Stubbs JR; Stuardi K; Hollis A; Clear L
    Immunohematology; 1995; 11(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 15447072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antibody screening in 37 degrees C saline. Is it safe to omit it using the indirect antiglobulin (gel) test?
    Duran J; Figueiredo M
    Immunohematology; 2002; 18(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15373569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of gel column technology, including comparative testing of Ortho ID-MTS with standard polyethylene glycol tube tests.
    Derr DA; Dickerson SJ; Steiner EA
    Immunohematology; 1998; 14(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 15377201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional tube agglutination with polyethylene glycol versus Red Cell Affinity Column Technology (ReACT): a comparison of antibody detection methods.
    Brumit MC; Stubbs JR
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 32(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 12017197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) reactivity of alloantibodies reacting by the manual polybrene technique but not by an antiglobulin test.
    Lown J; Willis J
    Transfus Med; 1995 Dec; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 8646292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One thousand seventy antibodies detected only by a 2-stage papain test: wanted and unwanted positive reactions.
    Castellá D; Cid J; Panadés M; Martín-Vega C
    Immunohematology; 2001; 17(4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15373578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening.
    Abou-Jabal A; Shubeilat T; Hajjiri F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 15751934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LISS-dependent autoantibody with apparent anti-U specificity.
    Chiofolo JT; Reid ME; Charles-Pierre D
    Immunohematology; 1995; 11(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 15447074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.