130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15374917)
1. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.
Ball JE; Osbourne J; Jowett S; Pellen M; Welfare MR
BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7467):665-7. PubMed ID: 15374917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completion rate to caecum as a quality measure of colonoscopy in a district general hospital.
Gorard DA; McIntyre AS
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Jul; 6(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 15206966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK.
Gavin DR; Valori RM; Anderson JT; Donnelly MT; Williams JG; Swarbrick ET
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 22661458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective audit of colonoscopy quality in Kent and Medway, UK.
Taylor KM; Arajs K; Rouse T; Harris AW
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 18389447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.
Imperiali G; Minoli G; Meucci GM; Spinzi G; Strocchi E; Terruzzi V; Radaelli F
Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17273959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three consecutive audits to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates.
Bhatty SA; Shaikh NA; Akhter SS; Manzoor H; Khatian A; Khan B; Ali SK
J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 Jul; 59(7):461-3. PubMed ID: 19579735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and safety issues in procedural rural practice: a prospective evaluation of current quality and safety guidelines in 3000 colonoscopies.
Azzopardi J; DeWitt DE
Rural Remote Health; 2012; 12():1949. PubMed ID: 22985075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful colonoscopy; completion rates and reasons for incompletion.
Mitchell RM; McCallion K; Gardiner KR; Watson RG; Collins JS
Ulster Med J; 2002 May; 71(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 12137162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring photographic proof of cecal intubation: A closed-loop audit of best practice colonoscopy.
Whitehead-Clarke T; Sothinathan R; Sandhya MA; Sharma D; Raja MA
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 40(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 33219988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data quality of the German screening colonoscopy registry.
Adler A; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Keining C; Stange G; Wiedenmann B; Gauger U; Altenhofen L; Rösch T
Endoscopy; 2013 Oct; 45(10):813-8. PubMed ID: 24019130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality and outcome assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: study of 202 colonoscopies].
Fratté S; Daucourt V; Fatisse A; Winkfield B
Presse Med; 2008 Sep; 37(9):1212-9. PubMed ID: 18329232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance in colonoscopy: role of endomucosal clips.
Maslekar S; Avery G; Duthie GS
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jul; 12(7):651-6. PubMed ID: 19486091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting outcomes in colonoscopy.
Selehi S; Leung E; Wong L
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18300826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colonoscopy audit over 10 years--what can be learnt?
Fraser AG; Gamble GD; Rose TR; Dunn JP
N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):25-35. PubMed ID: 24154767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Audit of bowel preparation with Picolax (sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate) for colonoscopy.
Thomson J; Phull P
Int J Clin Pract; 2006 May; 60(5):602-3. PubMed ID: 16700862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies.
Hendry PO; Jenkins JT; Diament RH
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):745-8. PubMed ID: 17477852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of the practical issues of local involvement in national audit of COPD.
Roberts CM; Lowe D; Barnes S; Pearson MG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2004 May; 10(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15189393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control of colonoscopy procedures: a prospective validated method for the evaluation of professional practices applicable to all endoscopic units.
Coriat R; Pommaret E; Chryssostalis A; Viennot S; Gaudric M; Brezault C; Lamarque D; Roche H; Verdier D; Parlier D; Prat F; Chaussade S
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 18783903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective audit of quality of colonoscopy in a surgical coloproctology unit.
Fasih T; Varma JS; Tabaqchali MA
Surgeon; 2004 Apr; 2(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 15568436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?
Church JM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 8147359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
