These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15375653)

  • 1. [The minimally invasive unicompartmental knee system "Preservation"First clinical results and analysis of complications].
    König DP; Popken F; Herzberg W; Eysel P
    Orthopade; 2004 Nov; 33(11):1284-9. PubMed ID: 15375653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
    Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
    Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].
    Aldinger PR; Clarius M; Murray DW; Goodfellow JW; Breusch SJ
    Orthopade; 2004 Nov; 33(11):1277-83. PubMed ID: 15480545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
    Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].
    Saxler G; Temmen D; Bontemps G
    Orthopade; 2004 Nov; 33(11):1267-76. PubMed ID: 15480541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Jenny JY; Müller PE; Weyer R; John M; Weber P; Ciobanu E; Schmitz A; Bacher T; Neumann W; Jansson V
    Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S117-21. PubMed ID: 17407935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
    Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Jenny JY
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Jul; 28(5):793-797. PubMed ID: 29280006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Jenny JY; Ciobanu E; Boeri C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():58-62. PubMed ID: 17572633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Navigation in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has no advantage in comparison to a conventional minimally invasive implantation.
    Weber P; Utzschneider S; Sadoghi P; Pietschmann MF; Ficklscherer A; Jansson V; Müller PE
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Feb; 132(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 21983975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survivorship and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive Uniglide medial fixed bearing, all-polyethylene tibia, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 7.3years.
    Forster-Horváth C; Artz N; Hassaballa MA; Robinson JR; Porteous AJ; Murray JR; Newman JH
    Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):981-986. PubMed ID: 27506988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre.
    Altuntas AO; Alsop H; Cobb JP
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 23274066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Surgical technique.
    Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():116-30. PubMed ID: 19255204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of four techniques combining less invasive approach and navigation.
    Jenny JY
    Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series.
    Kort NP; van Raay JJ; Cheung J; Jolink C; Deutman R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2007 Nov; 15(11):1331-4. PubMed ID: 17684726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigated unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Jenny JY
    Orthopedics; 2005 Oct; 28(10 Suppl):s1263-7. PubMed ID: 16235452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system.
    Buckup K; Linke LC; Hahne V
    Orthopedics; 2007 Aug; 30(8 Suppl):66-9. PubMed ID: 17824338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16365121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.