These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1537641)

  • 1. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys.
    Aquilino WS
    Int J Addict; 1992 Jan; 27(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 1537641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone.
    Gfroerer JC; Hughes AL
    Public Health Rep; 1991; 106(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 1908589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adequacy of household survey data for evaluating the nongroup health insurance market.
    Cantor JC; Monheit AC; Brownlee S; Schneider C
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1739-57. PubMed ID: 17610446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys.
    Donovan RJ; Holman CD; Corti B; Jalleh G
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9161067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?
    Novick G
    Res Nurs Health; 2008 Aug; 31(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 18203128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples.
    Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey.
    Fenig S; Levav I; Kohn R; Yelin N
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Jun; 83(6):896-8. PubMed ID: 8498632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: a randomized trial of telephone audio-CASI.
    Turner CF; Villarroel MA; Rogers SM; Eggleston E; Ganapathi L; Roman AM; Al-Tayyib A
    Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1432-44. PubMed ID: 16185205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telephone surveys in public health research.
    Marcus AC; Crane LA
    Med Care; 1986 Feb; 24(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 3945137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring youth behavior in response to structural changes. Alternative approaches for measuring adolescent drinking.
    Grube JW
    Eval Rev; 1997 Apr; 21(2):231-45. PubMed ID: 10183276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chapter VII. Nonsampling bias and variance in the SRC Telephone Survey data.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):47-50. PubMed ID: 15791756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
    Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental comparison of telephone and personal health interview surveys.
    Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):1-4. PubMed ID: 15791749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chapter III. Experimental interviewing techniques.
    Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):20-5. PubMed ID: 15791752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
    Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.
    Greenfield TK; Midanik LT; Rogers JD
    Addiction; 2000 Feb; 95(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 10723856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: a comparison of telephone and Web-based survey methods.
    Parks KA; Pardi AM; Bradizza CM
    J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Mar; 67(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 16562415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telephone health survey estimates: Effects of nonresponse and sample limitations.
    Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Buskirk TD; Roman A
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):700-706. PubMed ID: 30657170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.