584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376674)
1. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH; Carney AE; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
Müller V; Lang-Roth R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
Poissant SF; Whitmal NA; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
