BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376674)

  • 21. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB; Liepins R; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kwon BJ; Perry TT; Wilhelm CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3111-9. PubMed ID: 22501084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Visram AS; Kluk K; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 22894312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.