These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376674)

  • 61. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
    Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
    Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1711-8. PubMed ID: 16240829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Ihlefeld A; Deeks JM; Axon PR; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.
    Turner CW; Gantz BJ; Vidal C; Behrens A; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15101651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 19603890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.