160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376690)
21. Vocal behavior of the elusive purple frog of India (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis), a fossorial species endemic to the Western Ghats.
Thomas A; Suyesh R; Biju SD; Bee MA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e84809. PubMed ID: 24516517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus.
Chen J; Jono T; Cui J; Yue X; Tang Y
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146677. PubMed ID: 26752301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. St. Lawrence blue whale vocalizations revisited: characterization of calls detected from 1998 to 2001.
Berchok CL; Bradley DL; Gabrielson TB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2340-54. PubMed ID: 17069329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei).
Pettitt BA; Bourne GR; Bee MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4811-20. PubMed ID: 22712952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Female preferences for the spectral content of advertisement calls in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
Gupta S; Bee MA
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 36305902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical control of vocal plasticity in an echolocating bat.
Luo J; Wiegrebe L
J Exp Biol; 2016 Mar; 219(Pt 6):878-86. PubMed ID: 26823102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.
Narins PM; Feng AS; Lin W; Schnitzler HU; Denzinger A; Suthers RA; Xu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):910-3. PubMed ID: 15000202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acoustics of a small Australian burrowing cricket: the control of low-frequency pure-tone songs.
Bailey WJ; Bennet-Clark HC; Fletcher NH
J Exp Biol; 2001 Aug; 204(Pt 16):2827-41. PubMed ID: 11683438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acoustics of fish shelters: frequency response and gain properties.
Lugli M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3512-24. PubMed ID: 23145631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Torrent frogs emit acoustic signals of a narrower spectral range in habitats with longer-lasting biotic background noise.
Forti LR; de Melo Sampaio MR; Pires CR; Szabo JK; Toledo LF
Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104700. PubMed ID: 35798216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visualization of a chorus structure in multiple frog species by a sound discrimination device.
Awano H; Shirasaka M; Mizumoto T; Okuno HG; Aihara I
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2021 Jan; 207(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 33481121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Geographic variation and acoustic structure of the underwater vocalization of harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) in Norway, Sweden and Scotland.
Bjørgesaeter A; Ugland KI; Bjørge A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2459-68. PubMed ID: 15532676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.
Meenderink SW; Kits M; Narins PM
Biol Lett; 2010 Apr; 6(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 19939848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. When signal meets noise: immunity of the frog ear to interference.
Penna M; Gormaz JP; Narins PM
Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Jul; 96(7):835-43. PubMed ID: 19404599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Repetition patterns in Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) underwater multiple element calls.
Moors HB; Terhune JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1261-70. PubMed ID: 15376691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.
Fang G; Xue F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():77-84. PubMed ID: 24613236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The acoustic adaptation hypothesis in a widely distributed South American frog: Southernmost signals propagate better.
Velásquez NA; Moreno-Gómez FN; Brunetti E; Penna M
Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):6990. PubMed ID: 29725055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are frog calls relatively difficult to locate by mammalian predators?
Jones DL; Ratnam R
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 36508005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does advertisement call variation coincide with genetic variation in the genetically diverse frog taxon currently known as Leptodactylus fuscus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae)?
Heyer WR; Reid YR
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2003 Mar; 75(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 12715049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
