These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376690)

  • 61. Dynamics of frequency and amplitude modulations in vocalizations produced by eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus.
    Nelson BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1333-44. PubMed ID: 15058355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Lung mediated auditory contrast enhancement improves the Signal-to-noise ratio for communication in frogs.
    Lee N; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; White LA; Schrode KM; Bee MA
    Curr Biol; 2021 Apr; 31(7):1488-1498.e4. PubMed ID: 33667371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Acoustic analysis of vocal development in a New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
    Pistorio AL; Vintch B; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1655-70. PubMed ID: 17004487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Testosterone levels and evoked vocal responses in a natural population of the frog Batrachyla taeniata.
    Solís R; Penna M
    Horm Behav; 1997 Apr; 31(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9154430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Divergence of acoustic signals in a widely distributed frog: relevance of inter-male interactions.
    Velásquez NA; Opazo D; Díaz J; Penna M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87732. PubMed ID: 24489957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A three-parameter model for classifying anurans into four genera based on advertisement calls.
    Gingras B; Fitch WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):547-59. PubMed ID: 23297926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Low-frequency vocalizations of sei whales (Balaenoptera borealis) in the Southern Ocean.
    Calderan S; Miller B; Collins K; Ensor P; Double M; Leaper R; Barlow J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):EL418. PubMed ID: 25480092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Can treefrog phylogeographical clades and species' phylogenetic topologies be recovered by bioacoustical analyses?
    Forti LR; Lingnau R; Encarnação LC; Bertoluci J; Toledo LF
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169911. PubMed ID: 28235089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Sound radiation pattern of the advertisement call of the highly territorial poison frog Allobates femoralis.
    Rodríguez C; Hödl W
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():103996. PubMed ID: 31722233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Calling dynamics and call synchronization in a local group of unison bout callers.
    Jones DL; Jones RL; Ratnam R
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Jan; 200(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 24249152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Prior experience with conspecific signals enhances auditory midbrain responsiveness to conspecific vocalizations.
    Gall MD; Wilczynski W
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Jun; 217(Pt 11):1977-82. PubMed ID: 24871923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)].
    Wei L; Shao WW; Lin ZH
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Feb; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23389973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Nonlinear acoustics in cicada mating calls enhance sound propagation.
    Hughes DR; Nuttall AH; Katz RA; Carter GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):958-67. PubMed ID: 19206872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs.
    Both C; Grant T
    Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):714-6. PubMed ID: 22675139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Callback response of dugongs to conspecific chirp playbacks.
    Ichikawa K; Akamatsu T; Shinke T; Adulyanukosol K; Arai N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3623-9. PubMed ID: 21682387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Neglecting the call of the wild: Captive frogs like the sound of their own voice.
    Passos LF; Garcia G; Young RJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181931. PubMed ID: 28732034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
    Bee MA; Schwartz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2788-801. PubMed ID: 19894854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Bee MA
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Nov; 124(4):412-24. PubMed ID: 20853948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.