These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376789)

  • 1. An evaluation of the Vincentizing method of forming group-level response time distributions.
    Rouder JN; Speckman PL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 15376789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.
    Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 19815782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QMPE: estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound.
    Heathcote A; Brown S; Cousineau D
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 15354694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining reaction-time distributions to conserve shape.
    Sternberg S
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1164-1191. PubMed ID: 37253959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: an example using functions for the S-PLUS package.
    Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):678-94. PubMed ID: 15641415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: methods and packages.
    Cousineau D; Brown S; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):742-56. PubMed ID: 15641420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling across-trial variability in the Wald drift rate parameter.
    Steingroever H; Wabersich D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Jun; 53(3):1060-1076. PubMed ID: 32948979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percentile rank pooling: A simple nonparametric method for comparing group reaction time distributions with few trials.
    Miller J
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):781-791. PubMed ID: 32869140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring.
    Dolan CV; van der Maas HL; Molenaar PC
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):304-23. PubMed ID: 12395546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to fit a response time distribution.
    Van Zandt T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):424-65. PubMed ID: 11082851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
    Hasshim N; Downes M; Bate S; Parris BA
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing a group distribution from individual distributions.
    Cousineau D; Thivierge JP; Harding B; Lacouture Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):253-277. PubMed ID: 26569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions.
    Heathcote A; Brown S; Mewhort DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 12120806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-Gaussian Distributional Analyses of Reaction Times (RT): Improvements that Increase Efficacy of RT Tasks for Describing Cognitive Processes.
    Osmon DC; Kazakov D; Santos O; Kassel MT
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Sep; 28(3):359-376. PubMed ID: 30178182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions.
    Rouder JN; Lu J; Speckman P; Sun D; Jiang Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Apr; 12(2):195-223. PubMed ID: 16082801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical Bayes Gaussian likelihood estimation of exposure distributions from pooled samples in human biomonitoring.
    Li X; Kuk AY; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4999-5014. PubMed ID: 25213192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graphical presentation of distributions of risk in screening.
    Morris JK; Wald NJ
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 16156947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How priming in visual search affects response time distributions: analyses with ex-Gaussian fits.
    Kristjánsson A; Jóhannesson OI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2199-211. PubMed ID: 25073610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are model parameters linked to processing stages? An empirical investigation for the ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, and EZ diffusion models.
    Rieger T; Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1683-1699. PubMed ID: 30949790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donders revisited: Discrete or continuous temporal processing underlying reaction time distributions?
    Bao Y; Yang T; Lin X; Pöppel E
    Psych J; 2016 Sep; 5(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 27678483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.