These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376795)

  • 1. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Manwell LA; Roberts MA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 15376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.
    Labuschagne EM; Besner D
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():117. PubMed ID: 25713553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2004 Apr; 68(2-3):74-90. PubMed ID: 14634808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?
    Monahan JS
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 11277451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
    Burca M; Beaucousin V; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):220-40. PubMed ID: 12049241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 11495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The role of semantic attributes of the distractor word in the script type effect on the Stroop color-word interference task].
    Hayashi R
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Apr; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3210456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.
    Catena A; Fuentes LJ; Tudela P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 12026942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
    Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.