These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15376805)

  • 1. Logical reasoning and probabilities: a comprehensive test of Oaksford And Chater (2001).
    Oberauer K; Weidenfeld A; Hörnig R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 15376805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is inferential reasoning just probabilistic reasoning in disguise?
    Markovits H; Handley S
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16532862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian inference for the information gain model.
    Stringer S; Borsboom D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 21302022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critique of Oaksford, Chater, and Larkin's (2000) conditional probability model of conditional reasoning.
    Schroyens W; Schaeken W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):140-9; discussion 150-6. PubMed ID: 12549590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.
    Tessler MH; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
    Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(3):574-601. PubMed ID: 35005842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative informativeness of quantifiers used in syllogistic reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Roberts L; Chater N
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 11958347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negations in syllogistic reasoning: evidence for a heuristic-analytic conflict.
    Stupple EJ; Waterhouse EF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1533-41. PubMed ID: 19370481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data selection and natural sampling: probabilities do matter.
    Oaksford M; Wakefield M
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 12699150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of emotion on interpretation and logic in a conditional reasoning task.
    Blanchette I
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1112-25. PubMed ID: 17128609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference.
    Oaksford M; Chater N; Larkin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):883-99. PubMed ID: 10946369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Dialogical Entailment Task.
    Skovgaard-Olsen N
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104010. PubMed ID: 31376778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain.
    Gazzo Castañeda LE; Sklarek B; Dal Mas DE; Knauff M
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 275():120180. PubMed ID: 37211191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can we change how people reason? Effects of instructions to reason differently and reasoning strategy.
    Markovits H; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1773-1785. PubMed ID: 37883048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciding between accounts of the selection task: a reply to Oaksford (2002).
    Feeney A; Handley S; Kentridge RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1079-88. PubMed ID: 12881170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early and late processes in syllogistic reasoning: evidence from eye-movements.
    Espino O; Santamaría C; Meseguer E; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2005 Nov; 98(1):B1-9. PubMed ID: 15992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task.
    Handley SJ; Feeney A; Harper C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):799-818. PubMed ID: 12188514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental and individual differences in conditional reasoning: effects of logic instructions and alternative antecedents.
    Daniel DB; Klaczynski PA
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(2):339-54. PubMed ID: 16611176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.