These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377045)
1. [Breast cancer screening in Japan--present status and recent movement]. Endo T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 64(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 15377045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Breast cancer]. Fukuda M; Miyamoto K; Hashizume R; Okamoto J; Kawamoto H; Yabuki Y; Ogata H; Ohta T Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1900-6. PubMed ID: 12465388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time trends in breast cancer screening rates in the OECD countries. Saika K; Sobue T Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):591-2. PubMed ID: 21447696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Participation rates in the third round (2006-2007) of the breast cancer screening program in Hungary]. Boncz I; Döbrõssy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Vajda R; Sebestyén A Magy Onkol; 2013 Sep; 57(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 24107819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of Impact of the 2009 USPSTF Guidelines on Rates of Mammography Screening. Brown C; Nevola A; Martin BC J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jul; 27(7):875-884. PubMed ID: 29583065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010. Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography: consideration about radiation from the point of a radiologist's view]. Tohno E Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 12766283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. Chang CH; Bynum JP; Onega T; Colla CH; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Oct; 25(10):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 27427790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program]. Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Kövi R; Ember I Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(32):1491-8. PubMed ID: 18672438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammographic screening in Japan. Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan]. Yamada T; Suzuki A Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska. Rettig B; Nelson N; Faulk R Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes (2000-2010)]. Giordano L; Giorgi D; Ventura L; Castagno R; Paci E; Segnan N Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(6 Suppl 1):28-38. PubMed ID: 23293269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening and the changing population pyramid of Japan. Uchida K; Ohashi H; Kinoshita S; Nogi H; Kato K; Toriumi Y; Yamashita A; Kamio M; Mimoto R; Takeyama H Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 23625276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group. Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan. Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]