These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377045)

  • 21. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes--1996-2005.
    Giordano L; Giorgi D; Piccini P; Ventura L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Paci E; Segnan N
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(2 Suppl 1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18770993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Barriers to screening for breast cancer.
    Smith RA; Haynes S
    Cancer; 1992 Apr; 69(7 Suppl):1968-78. PubMed ID: 1544102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trends in mammography 1991-96 and the impact of nationwide screening in The Netherlands.
    van Leiden HA; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; van der Maas PJ; de Koning HJ
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10444728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
    Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
    Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Role of radiotechnologists in mammography screening for breast cancer].
    Ohuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 60(9):1269-72. PubMed ID: 15459559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.
    Yaffe MJ; Mittmann N; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Stout NK
    Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):9-15. PubMed ID: 26676234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994.
    Gaudette LA; Altmayer CA; Nobrega KM; Lee J
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(3):17-27(Eng); 19-30(Fre). PubMed ID: 9085118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
    Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2008 Mar; 75 Suppl 1():S2-9. PubMed ID: 18457191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening.
    Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidrich J; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Rofo; 2016 Jan; 188(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 26485700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving the adherence of urban women to mammography guidelines: strategies for radiologists.
    Fox SA; Klos DS; Worthen NJ; Pennington E; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 2294548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening mammography in women less than age 50 years.
    Kerlikowske K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22037165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.