These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377098)

  • 1. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
    Chakraborty DP; Berbaum KS
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
    Chakraborty DP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1554-66. PubMed ID: 19000872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
    Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC.
    Zheng B; Chakraborty DP; Rockette HE; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15895587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization.
    Chakraborty D
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 11918367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
    Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
    Chakraborty D; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1187-93. PubMed ID: 16979067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
    Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
    Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
    Popescu LM
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
    Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
    Swensson RG
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consistency of methods for analysing location-specific data.
    Zanca F; Chakraborty DP; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):52-6. PubMed ID: 20159917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
    Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.