329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377100)
1. Penalized likelihood fluence optimization with evolutionary components for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.
Baydush AH; Marks LB; Das SK
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2335-43. PubMed ID: 15377100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A fast deep learning approach for beam orientation optimization for prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A; Ogunmolu O; Jiang S; Nguyen D
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):880-897. PubMed ID: 31868927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS; Nugent Z
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17985640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A feasibility study of automated inverse treatment planning for cancer of the prostate.
Reinstein LE; Wang XH; Burman CM; Chen Z; Mohan R; Kutcher G; Leibel SA; Fuks Z
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 9422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming.
D'Souza WD; Meyer RR; Shi L
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(15):3465-81. PubMed ID: 15379026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal Sayed H; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2049-2060. PubMed ID: 32077497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning.
Fiege J; McCurdy B; Potrebko P; Champion H; Cull A
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5217-29. PubMed ID: 21978066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beam orientation selection for intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on target equivalent uniform dose maximization.
Das S; Cullip T; Tracton G; Chang S; Marks L; Anscher M; Rosenman J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jan; 55(1):215-24. PubMed ID: 12504056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy using adaptive l(2,1)-minimization.
Jia X; Men C; Lou Y; Jiang SB
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6205-22. PubMed ID: 21891848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic learning-based beam angle selection for thoracic IMRT.
Amit G; Purdie TG; Levinshtein A; Hope AJ; Lindsay P; Marshall A; Jaffray DA; Pekar V
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1992-2005. PubMed ID: 25832090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm.
Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2170-9. PubMed ID: 18561692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Pugachev A; Li JG; Boyer AL; Hancock SL; Le QT; Donaldson SS; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jun; 50(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 11380245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
