835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377106)
1. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full-field breast tomosynthesis.
Smith A
Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(5):25-31. PubMed ID: 16294583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography.
James JJ; Giannotti E; Chen Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Oct; 73(10):886-892. PubMed ID: 29970247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
Zhou XH; Gordon R
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.
Houssami N; Ciatto S
Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 21605590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What's new in mammography.
Simonetti G; Cossu E; Montanaro M; Caschili C; Giuliani V
Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S234-41. PubMed ID: 9652528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection.
Singh V; Saunders C; Wylie L; Bourke A
Future Oncol; 2008 Aug; 4(4):501-13. PubMed ID: 18684061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training.
Kallenberg M; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6879-91. PubMed ID: 19001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
