These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377649)

  • 1. Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram.
    Keenan KG; Farina D; Maluf KS; Merletti R; Enoka RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Jan; 98(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 15377649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG.
    Keenan KG; Farina D; Merletti R; Enoka RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Jun; 100(6):1928-37. PubMed ID: 16397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuromuscular adjustments that constrain submaximal EMG amplitude at task failure of sustained isometric contractions.
    Dideriksen JL; Enoka RM; Farina D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2011 Aug; 111(2):485-94. PubMed ID: 21596915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions.
    Farina D; Falla D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cancellation on triggered averaging used to determine synchronization between motor unit discharge in separate muscles.
    Poulsen P; Svendsen JH; Tucker K; Graven-Nielsen T; Hodges PW
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Aug; 182(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19406151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can standard surface EMG processing parameters be used to estimate motor unit global firing rate?
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Jun; 1(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 15876628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions.
    Yao W; Fuglevand RJ; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 83(1):441-52. PubMed ID: 10634886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amplitude cancellation of motor-unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram can be estimated with spike-triggered averaging.
    Farina D; Cescon C; Negro F; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):431-40. PubMed ID: 18463179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of high motor unit synchronization levels on non-linear and spectral variables of the surface EMG.
    Fattorini L; Felici F; Filligoi GC; Traballesi M; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Apr; 143(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15814145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique to track individual motor unit action potentials in surface EMG by monitoring their conduction velocities and amplitudes.
    Beck RB; Houtman CJ; O'Malley MJ; Lowery MM; Stegeman DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 15825864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of fatigue on the simulated relation between the amplitude of the surface electromyogram and muscle force.
    Dideriksen JL; Farina D; Enoka RM
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2765-81. PubMed ID: 20439272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spike-triggered average torque and muscle fiber conduction velocity of low-threshold motor units following submaximal endurance contractions.
    Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Graven-Nielsen T
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Apr; 98(4):1495-502. PubMed ID: 15542567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of motor unit properties on the size of the simulated evoked surface EMG potential.
    Keenan KG; Farina D; Merletti R; Enoka RM
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 169(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 16273406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conduction velocity of quiescent muscle fibers decreases during sustained contraction.
    Gazzoni M; Camelia F; Farina D
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):387-94. PubMed ID: 15703224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials.
    Schulte E; Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV; Rau G; Disselhorst-Klug C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 15763676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from simulated surface EMG in pinnate muscles.
    Mesin L; Damiano L; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 160(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 17070925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of contraction amplitude and firing history on spike-triggered averaged trapezius motor unit potentials.
    Westad C; Westgaard RH
    J Physiol; 2005 Feb; 562(Pt 3):965-75. PubMed ID: 15576452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations.
    Houtman CJ; Stegeman DF; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2003 Sep; 95(3):1045-54. PubMed ID: 12766181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor unit recruitment and bursts of activity in the surface electromyogram during a sustained contraction.
    Riley ZA; Terry ME; Mendez-Villanueva A; Litsey JC; Enoka RM
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 18288713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.