These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377718)

  • 1. Can static plantar pressures of prepubertal children be predicted by inked footprints?
    Dowling AM; Steele JR; Baur LA
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2004; 94(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 15377718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children?
    Dowling AM; Steele JR; Baur LA
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Jun; 25(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 11439299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of static footprints and pedobarography in obese and non-obese children.
    Taisa Filippin N; de Almeida Bacarin T; Lobo da Costa PH
    Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1141-4. PubMed ID: 19026210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of footprint measurements with plantar kinetics: a linear regression model.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 24725031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?
    Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of an intraoperative plantar pressure assessment device.
    Ellis SJ; Hillstrom H; Cheng R; Lipman J; Garrison G; Deland JT
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Apr; 30(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 19356358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic footprint measurement collection technique and intrarater reliability: ink mat, paper pedography, and electronic pedography.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2012; 102(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22461270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of footprint indexes calculated from ink and electronic footprints.
    Urry SR; Wearing SC
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2001 Apr; 91(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 11319250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can static foot posture measurements predict regional plantar surface area?
    McPoil TG; Haager M; Hilt J; Klapheke J; Martinez R; VanSteenwyk C; Weber N; Cornwall MW; Bade M
    Foot (Edinb); 2014 Dec; 24(4):161-8. PubMed ID: 25168472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescent children?
    Riddiford-Harland DL; Steele JR; Storlien LH
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2000 May; 24(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 10849573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What are the effects of obesity in children on plantar pressure distributions?
    Dowling AM; Steele JR; Baur LA
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2004 Nov; 28(11):1514-9. PubMed ID: 15303103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between plantar pressure and footprint shape.
    Hatala KG; Dingwall HL; Wunderlich RE; Richmond BG
    J Hum Evol; 2013 Jul; 65(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23725794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis.
    Yalçin N; Esen E; Kanatli U; Yetkin H
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21088466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent Validity of an Automated Footprint Detection Algorithm to Measure Plantar Contact Area During Walking.
    Lidstone DE; Porcher LM; DeBerardinis J; Dufek JS; Trabia MB
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2019 Nov; 109(6):416-425. PubMed ID: 30427700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing.
    Cavanagh PR; Rodgers MM; Iiboshi A
    Foot Ankle; 1987 Apr; 7(5):262-76. PubMed ID: 3583160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief.
    Owings TM; Woerner JL; Frampton JD; Cavanagh PR; Botek G
    Diabetes Care; 2008 May; 31(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 18252899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns between foot orthoses provided by the CAD-CAM and foam impression methods.
    Ki SW; Leung AK; Li AN
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 18677672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of plantar pressures in leprosy patients by using custom made shoes and total contact insoles.
    Tang SF; Chen CP; Lin SC; Wu CK; Chen CK; Cheng SP
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 129 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 25683306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.