These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377938)

  • 1. Implantable microstimulator: magnetic resonance safety at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Cosendai G; Park SM; Nyenhuis JA
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):591-9. PubMed ID: 15377938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug eluting coronary stent: in vitro evaluation of magnet resonance safety at 3 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Forder JR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 15881523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Fragmented, Open-Coil, Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Leads.
    Shellock FG; Zare A; Ilfeld BM; Chae J; Strother RB
    Neuromodulation; 2018 Apr; 21(3):276-283. PubMed ID: 29057550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for a breast tissue expander with a remote port.
    Linnemeyer H; Shellock FG; Ahn CY
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2001; 3(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 11777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: assessment of MR safety and artifacts.
    Shellock FG; Hatfield M; Simon BJ; Block S; Wamboldt J; Starewicz PM; Punchard WF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 10931583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-Tesla MRI of deep brain stimulation patients: safety assessment of coils and pulse sequences.
    Boutet A; Hancu I; Saha U; Crawley A; Xu DS; Ranjan M; Hlasny E; Chen R; Foltz W; Sammartino F; Coblentz A; Kucharczyk W; Lozano AM
    J Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 132(2):586-594. PubMed ID: 30797197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues for a wirelessly powered lead used for epidural, spinal cord stimulation.
    Shellock FG; Audet-Griffin AJ
    Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):334-9; discussion 339. PubMed ID: 24024673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new vascular coupling device: assessment of MRI issues at 3-tesla.
    Titterington B; Puschmann C; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 24581726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.
    Gill A; Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 22230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventricular assist device implant (AB 5000) prototype cannula: in vitro assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Valencerina S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2008 May; 10(1):23. PubMed ID: 18495028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Septal repair implants: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging safety at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Valencerina S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 23(10):1021-5. PubMed ID: 16376188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI safety and imaging artifacts evaluated for a cannulated screw used for guided growth surgery.
    Thompson RM; Fowler E; Culo B; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 66():219-225. PubMed ID: 31704394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro assessment of 3-T MRI issues for a bioabsorbable, coronary artery scaffold with metallic markers.
    Shellock FG; Giangarra CJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 32(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24315524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metallic neurosurgical implants for cranial reconstruction and fixation: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating and artefacts at 3.0 Tesla.
    Cunningham AS; Harding S; Chatfield DA; Hutchinson P; Carpenter TA; Pickard JD; Menon DK
    Br J Neurosurg; 2005 Apr; 19(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 16120521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical external immobilization devices: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues at 3.0 Tesla.
    Diaz FL; Tweardy L; Shellock FG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 20110847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of MRI issues for a new cerebral spinal fluid shunt, gravitational valve (GV).
    Moghtader D; Crawack HJ; Miethke C; Dörlemann Z; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():8-14. PubMed ID: 28735732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.