These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15377938)

  • 21. Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects.
    Dula AN; Virostko J; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 24450683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.
    Edwards MB; Taylor KM; Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 10931602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):543-7. PubMed ID: 10470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of MRI issues at 1.5 T for the Temperature Logger Implant.
    Mahrouyan O; Tøien Ø; Shellock FG
    J Therm Biol; 2018 May; 74():249-255. PubMed ID: 29801635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A next-generation, flow-diverting implant used to treat brain aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating and artifacts at 3-T.
    Karacozoff AM; Shellock FG; Wakhloo AK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 31(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 22901731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jan; 13(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 11169818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [MRI safety aspects and artifacts of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale occluders at 1.5 tesla: a phantom study].
    Bock M; Mohrs OK; Voigtlaender T; Kauczor HU; Semmler W
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 16508833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temperature measurement on neurological pulse generators during MR scans.
    Kainz W; Neubauer G; Uberbacher R; Alesch F; Chan DD
    Biomed Eng Online; 2002 Sep; 1():2. PubMed ID: 12437766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla.
    Shellock FG; Fischer L; Fieno DS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 17178677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of MRI Issues for a New Wirelessly Powered, Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead With Receiver.
    Vasquez LP; Chen J; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):406-412. PubMed ID: 31846373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of RF heating due to various implants during MR procedures.
    Muranaka H; Horiguchi T; Ueda Y; Tanki N
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2011; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 21441723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) bioprosthesis.
    Saeedi M; Thomas A; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 25620522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of MRI issues for the Argus II retinal prosthesis.
    Weiland JD; Faraji B; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 22260934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 3-Tesla MRI in patients with fully implanted deep brain stimulation devices: a preliminary study in 10 patients.
    Sammartino F; Krishna V; Sankar T; Fisico J; Kalia SK; Hodaie M; Kucharczyk W; Mikulis DJ; Crawley A; Lozano AM
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 127(4):892-898. PubMed ID: 28009238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations.
    Rezai AR; Phillips M; Baker KB; Sharan AD; Nyenhuis J; Tkach J; Henderson J; Shellock FG
    Invest Radiol; 2004 May; 39(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 15087724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MR safety in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation systems (DBS).
    Sharan A; Rezai AR; Nyenhuis JA; Hrdlicka G; Tkach J; Baker K; Turbay M; Rugieri P; Phillips M; Shellock FG
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2003; 87():141-5. PubMed ID: 14518542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantification of direct current in electrically active implants using MRI methods.
    Wojtczyk H; Graf H; Martirosian P; Ballweg V; Kraiger M; Pintaske J; Schick F
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 21277177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of magnetic resonance imagers on implanted neurostimulators.
    Gleason CA; Kaula NF; Hricak H; Schmidt RA; Tanagho EA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jan; 15(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 1371004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.