65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15378253)
1. Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced examinations with fat suppression: are contrast-agent uptake curves affected by magnetic field inhomogeneity?
Schmidt MA; Borri M; Scurr E; Ertas G; Payne G; O'Flynn E; Desouza N; Leach MO
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1537-45. PubMed ID: 23242002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Textural Features of Mouse Glioma Models Measured by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images with 3D Isotropic Resolution.
Kiser K; Zhang J; Kim SG
Tomography; 2023 Mar; 9(2):721-735. PubMed ID: 37104129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.
Fujita H; Kuwahata N; Hattori H; Kinoshita H; Fukuda H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 26894360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver.
Mainardi LT; Passera KM; Lucesoli A; Potepan P; Setti E; Musumeci R
BMC Med Imaging; 2006 Jun; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16759378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.
Morrison CK; Henze Bancroft LC; DeMartini WB; Holmes JH; Wang K; Bosca RJ; Korosec FR; Strigel RM
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 27898602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?
Kurz KD; Wittsack HJ; Willers R; Blondin D; Mödder U; Saleh A
Eur Radiol; 2007 Dec; 17(12):3093-9. PubMed ID: 17572896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?
Sardanelli F; Podo F
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):873-87. PubMed ID: 17008989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Jaeger H; Maderwald S; Stockamp C; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Eur Radiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):2834-41. PubMed ID: 16896702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.
Deurloo EE; Klein Zeggelink WF; Teertstra HJ; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ; Muller SH; Bartelink H; Gilhuijs KG
Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 16328447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic MRI of the breast.
Ercolani P; Valeri G; Amici F
Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S265-71. PubMed ID: 9652533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Kunz RP; Hintze C; Hlawatsch A; Kern A; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Eur Radiol; 2004 Oct; 14(10):1732-42. PubMed ID: 15378253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders.
Pääkkö E; Reinikainen H; Lindholm EL; Rissanen T
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1361-8. PubMed ID: 15711841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
