These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15378597)

  • 1. Plaintiff life-taking: the effect of mock juror attitudes toward suicide on assignment of negligence and damages in a civil suit.
    Worthington DL
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(5):715-30. PubMed ID: 15378597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case.
    Bornstein BH; Rung LM; Miller MK
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 12210975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating juror accuracy, juror ability, and the relationship between them.
    Park K
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):288-305. PubMed ID: 20658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
    Louden JE; Skeem JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches.
    Koehler JJ; Thompson WC
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):455-68. PubMed ID: 16786400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fostering juror comfort: effects of an orientation videotape.
    Bradshaw GS; Ross DF; Bradshaw EE; Headrick B; Thomas WN
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):457-67. PubMed ID: 16133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
    Miller MK; Hayward RD
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias.
    Bloechl AL; Vitacco MJ; Neumann CS; Erickson SE
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17166589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
    Smith AC; Greene E
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stranger at the gate: the effect of the plaintiff's use of an interpreter on juror decision-making.
    Shuman DW; Stokes L; Martinez G
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 21618274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal issues of professional negligence in suicide cases.
    Packman WL; Pennuto TO; Bongar B; Orthwein J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 15378596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Civil juror compensation and judgments of police use of force at the intersection of race and mental illness.
    Sturges HA; Flick C; Provenza K; Nunez N
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Jul; 40(4):514-531. PubMed ID: 35066908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
    Huntley JE; Costanzo M
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 12647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of liability information, severity of injury, and attitudes toward vengeance on damage awards.
    Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):239-58. PubMed ID: 18481684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process.
    Butler B
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):857-67. PubMed ID: 18046739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making.
    Bright DA; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 16786406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.