These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15378819)
41. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent. Apel SB Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. J.B. v. M.B. New Jersey. Superior Court. Appellate Division Wests Atl Report; 2000; 751():613-20. PubMed ID: 16285110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Court says woman can bar embryos' use. N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():B6. PubMed ID: 12155241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Embryo Disposition Disputes: Controversies and Case Law. Cohen IG; Adashi EY Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Jul; 46(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 27417864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Judge orders divorcing couple's frozen embryos destroyed. N Y Times Web; 1998 Sep; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11647640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Excess embryos: is embryo adoption a new solution or a temporary fix? Johnson ND Brooklyn Law Rev; 2003; 68(3):853-83. PubMed ID: 15237519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The use and disposal of stored embryos. Dickens BM Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 27177517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. King Solomon in the age of assisted reproduction. Waldman E Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 24(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 15164747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Ulysses and the fate of frozen embryos--reproduction, research, or destruction? Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 10922428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Rehabilitating bioethics: recontextualizing in vitro fertilization outside contractual autonomy. Lin O Duke Law J; 2004 Nov; 54(2):485-511. PubMed ID: 15940846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Massachusetts case is latest to ask court to decide fate of frozen embryos. Goldberg C N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches. Daar JF J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional? Schaefer K Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Genesis retold: legal issues raised by the cryopreservation of preimplantation human embryos. Saltarelli JJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1985; 36(3):1021-53. PubMed ID: 16086476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition. Ziegler M Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(2):515-67. PubMed ID: 30707003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]