These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15378823)

  • 1. Judicial birth control?: the Ninth Circuit's examination of the fundamental right to procreate in Gerber v. Hickman.
    Bozzuti JJ
    St Johns Law Rev; 2003; 77(3):625-47. PubMed ID: 15378823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life-term inmates' right to procreate via artificial insemination: why so much fuss over the contents of a plastic cup?
    Harrington LS
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2002; 33(3):521-49. PubMed ID: 16493804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2006/13 case of Dickson v. The United Kingdom, 18 April 2006, no. 44362/04 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2006 Sep; 13(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 17190356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial human reproduction: legal problems presented by the test tube baby.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Sep; 3(7):5-39. PubMed ID: 10289336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skepticism follows court ruling in favor of inmate procreation.
    Glaberson W
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Sep; ():A7. PubMed ID: 12156355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right to procreate is not aborted. Dickson v. United Kingdom.
    Eijkholt M
    Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):284-93. PubMed ID: 18490358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "art" of procreation: why assisted reproduction technology allows for the preservation of female prisoners' right to procreate.
    Dunn SL
    Fordham Law Rev; 2002 May; 70(6):2561-602. PubMed ID: 12058776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You have the right not to have a hearing: an evaluation of the impact of fully advising civilly committed patients on their rights.
    Huss MT; Zeiss RA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(4):334-41. PubMed ID: 15935478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. California penal code section 645: legislators practice medicine on child molesters.
    Moog A
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):711-37. PubMed ID: 10394768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. And some grow mad, and all grow bad: prisoners' constitutional right to receive psychiatric treatment.
    Jennings EM
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):160-85. PubMed ID: 16100811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fourteen prisoners sue to have right to save sperm.
    Bishop K
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jan; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent developments in health law. Civil rights: prisoners' right to treatment information under Pabon v. Wright.
    Wilansky DP
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(4):831-2. PubMed ID: 17199828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prisoner participation in clinical research trials: a fundamental right under the eighth amendment?
    Lee V
    J Leg Med; 2012 Oct; 33(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 23216151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Basics of civil and criminal law of psychiatric coercive measures in France].
    Gravier B; Völlm B
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Mar; 34(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17390265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medically necessary organ transplants for prisoners: who is responsible for payment?
    Wright J
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 39(5):1251-92. PubMed ID: 16211764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cruel and unusual punishment in the provision of prison medical care: challenging the deliberate indifference standard.
    Friedman MC
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1992 May; 45(4):921-49. PubMed ID: 16047450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prisons. Mississippi upholds segregation for HIV-positive inmates.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Feb; 19(3):7. PubMed ID: 15045973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bill to ban reproduction of inmates with cancer proposed in New South Wales.
    Rasko JE
    Med J Aust; 2006 Nov; 185(10):575-6. PubMed ID: 17115973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Human fundamental rights and reproductive health in international documents].
    Fatechance IL
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2000; (10):38-41. PubMed ID: 11109790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.