These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Paradoxes and political problems: the U.S. approach to ART as seen from the U.K. Thomas S Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 15379096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Something old and something new. Hudson K Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 15379095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clones, parents, persons and the law in Australia. Josko RM Clin Ter; 2002; 153(6):421-7. PubMed ID: 12645399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New Zealand Bioethics Conference February 2004: emerging biotechnologies: ethics and regulation. Evans D N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Feb; 5(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15597488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why conservatives care about biotechnology. Wolfson A New Atlantis; 2003; (2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15584197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states. Heidt-Forsythe E AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28949871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology. Jasanoff S Not Polit; 2001; 17(62):34-50. PubMed ID: 15468485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges of the new biotechnology. Charlesworth M Australas Cathol Rec; 1989 Jan; 66(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16998987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Harming future persons: obligations to the children of reproductive technology. Peters PG South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1999; 8(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 12778916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of the federal government in assisted reproductive technologies. Lal M Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1997; 13(2):517-43. PubMed ID: 16528854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]