140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15380066)
1. Bayesian inference of the metazoan phylogeny; a combined molecular and morphological approach.
Glenner H; Hansen AJ; Sørensen MV; Ronquist F; Huelsenbeck JP; Willerslev E
Curr Biol; 2004 Sep; 14(18):1644-9. PubMed ID: 15380066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data.
Bapst DW; Schreiber HA; Carlson SJ
Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 28482055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When molecules and morphology clash: reconciling conflicting phylogenies of the Metazoa by considering secondary character loss.
Jenner RA
Evol Dev; 2004; 6(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 15330870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters.
Harrison LB; Larsson HC
Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 25527198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the thoracican barnacles using molecular and morphological evidence: a comparison of several divergence time estimation approaches.
Pérez-Losada M; Høeg JT; Crandall KA
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):244-64. PubMed ID: 15205051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homoplasy-Based Partitioning Outperforms Alternatives in Bayesian Analysis of Discrete Morphological Data.
Rosa BB; Melo GAR; Barbeitos MS
Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):657-671. PubMed ID: 30649562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria.
Lartillot N; Philippe H
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 363(1496):1463-72. PubMed ID: 18192187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (porifera, hexactinellida).
Dohrmann M; Janussen D; Reitner J; Collins AG; Worheide G
Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):388-405. PubMed ID: 18570034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data.
Nylander JA; Ronquist F; Huelsenbeck JP; Nieves-Aldrey JL
Syst Biol; 2004 Feb; 53(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 14965900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular phylogeny of the carnivora (mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships.
Flynn JJ; Finarelli JA; Zehr S; Hsu J; Nedbal MA
Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):317-37. PubMed ID: 16012099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Near intron pairs and the metazoan tree.
Lehmann J; Stadler PF; Krauss V
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):811-23. PubMed ID: 23201572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian Morphological Clock Methods Resurrect Placoderm Monophyly and Reveal Rapid Early Evolution in Jawed Vertebrates.
King B; Qiao T; Lee MSY; Zhu M; Long JA
Syst Biol; 2017 Jul; 66(4):499-516. PubMed ID: 27920231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of the trypanorhynch tapeworms: parasite phylogeny supports independent lineages of sharks and rays.
Olson PD; Caira JN; Jensen K; Overstreet RM; Palm HW; Beveridge I
Int J Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 40(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 19761769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ontogeny discombobulates phylogeny: paedomorphosis and higher-level salamander relationships.
Wiens J; Bonett R; Chippindale P
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 15805013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-scale parsimony analysis of metazoan indels in protein-coding genes.
Belinky F; Cohen O; Huchon D
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Feb; 27(2):441-51. PubMed ID: 19864469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phylogeny and biogeography of dolichoderine ants: effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference.
Ward PS; Brady SG; Fisher BL; Schultz TR
Syst Biol; 2010 May; 59(3):342-62. PubMed ID: 20525640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular phylogeny of Arthrotardigrada (Tardigrada).
Jørgensen A; Faurby S; Hansen JG; Møbjerg N; Kristensen RM
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Mar; 54(3):1006-15. PubMed ID: 19822216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction using empirical morphological data.
Schrago CG; Aguiar BO; Mello B
J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 29957887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
