318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15380283)
1. The global political economy of scheduling: the international-historical context of the Controlled Substances Act.
McAllister WB
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Oct; 76(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 15380283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regime change: re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
Bewley-Taylor D; Jelsma M
Int J Drug Policy; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 21996163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ratification of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances 1971 and its transposition into national legislation in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Schröder O
Bull Narc; 1982; 34(3-4):1-19. PubMed ID: 6926511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicines and the drug control treaties: is buprenorphine for opioid addiction at risk of being lost?
Costa E Silva JA
Hum Psychopharmacol; 2004 Jun; 19(4):215-24. PubMed ID: 15181649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Controlled Substances Act: how a "big tent" reform became a punitive drug law.
Courtwright DT
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Oct; 76(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15380284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addiction concepts and international control.
Room R
Soc Hist Alcohol Drugs; 2006; 21(2):276-89. PubMed ID: 20063498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The monitoring of trade in and control of psychotropic substances to guard against their diversion.
Bayer I
Bull Narc; 1983; 35(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 6563923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drugs, the criminal law, and the administration of justice.
Moore MH
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(4):529-60. PubMed ID: 1806801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Debating the Controlled Substances Act.
Spillane JF
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Oct; 76(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 15380285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on exempted preparations.
Halbach H
Bull Narc; 1983; 35(1):17-40. PubMed ID: 6555054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International control of alcohol: alternative paths forward.
Room R
Drug Alcohol Rev; 2006 Nov; 25(6):581-95. PubMed ID: 17132575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evolving problem: methamphetamine production and trafficking in the United States.
Shukla RK; Crump JL; Chrisco ES
Int J Drug Policy; 2012 Nov; 23(6):426-35. PubMed ID: 22943831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-level governance: The way forward for European illicit drug policy?
Chatwin C
Int J Drug Policy; 2007 Dec; 18(6):494-502. PubMed ID: 18061875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking 'flexibilities' in the international drug control system-Potential, precedents and models for reforms.
Collins J
Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Oct; 60():107-114. PubMed ID: 28129946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004: a study in the political economy of drug policy.
Denham BE
J Health Soc Policy; 2006; 22(2):51-78. PubMed ID: 17255072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Illicit drugs and internationalism: the forgotten dimension. Essay review.
Berridge V
Med Hist; 2001 Apr; 45(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 11373864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating khat--dilemmas and opportunities for the international drug control system.
Klein A; Beckerleg S; Hailu D
Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Nov; 20(6):509-13. PubMed ID: 19535239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. History of drug use and drug control.
Fox DM
Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):403-5; discussion 437-42. PubMed ID: 1753976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Keeping the lid on: a century of drug regulation and control.
Spillane J; McAllister WB
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2003 Jun; 70(3 Suppl):S5-12. PubMed ID: 12759194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The technique of controlled delivery as a weapon in dealing with illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.
Cutting PD
Bull Narc; 1983; 35(4):15-22. PubMed ID: 6563921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
