247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15380386)
21. Plankton predation rates in turbulence: a study of the limitations imposed on a predator with a non-spherical field of sensory perception.
Lewis DM; Bala SI
J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 16542686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Partial migration in birds: tests of three hypotheses in a tropical lekking frugivore.
Boyle WA
J Anim Ecol; 2008 Nov; 77(6):1122-8. PubMed ID: 18657208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On the dynamics of predation risk perception for a vigilant forager.
Sirot E; Pays O
J Theor Biol; 2011 May; 276(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21295597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches.
Shochat E; Lerman SB; Katti M; Lewis DB
Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 15278846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Group size effects on foraging and vigilance in migratory Tibetan antelope.
Lian X; Zhang T; Cao Y; Su J; Thirgood S
Behav Processes; 2007 Nov; 76(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 17582704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Size-dependent predation risk in tree-feeding insects with different colouration strategies: a field experiment.
Remmel T; Tammaru T
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Sep; 78(5):973-80. PubMed ID: 19493131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bee-eaters ( Merops orientalis) respond to what a predator can see.
Watve M; Thakar J; Kale A; Puntambekar S; Shaikh I; Vaze K; Jog M; Paranjape S
Anim Cogn; 2002 Dec; 5(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 12461603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Basal metabolic rate and risk-taking behaviour in birds.
Møller AP
J Evol Biol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):2420-9. PubMed ID: 19840205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Referential calls signal predator behavior in a group-living bird species.
Griesser M
Curr Biol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 18177716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.
Krivan V
Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):771-82. PubMed ID: 17926298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Behaviourally mediated indirect effects: interference competition increases predation mortality in foraging redshanks.
Minderman J; Lind J; Cresswell W
J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):713-23. PubMed ID: 16689954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous.
Proctor CJ; Broom M; Ruxton GD
J Theor Biol; 2001 Aug; 211(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 11476624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficiency evaluation of two competing foraging modes under different conditions.
Scharf I; Nulman E; Ovadia O; Bouskila A
Am Nat; 2006 Sep; 168(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 16947110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls.
Götmark F; Winkler DW; Andersson M
Nature; 1986 Feb 13-19; 319(6054):589-91. PubMed ID: 3945345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The response of a selfish herd to an attack from outside the group perimeter.
Viscido SV; Miller M; Wethey DS
J Theor Biol; 2001 Feb; 208(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 11207093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics.
Heithaus MR; Wirsing AJ; Burkholder D; Thomson J; Dill LM
J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 19076259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Up, up, and away: relative importance of horizontal and vertical escape from predators for survival and senescence.
Møller AP
J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1689-98. PubMed ID: 20561137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of density dependent migrations on the dynamics of a predator prey model.
Mchich R; Bergam A; Raïssi N
Acta Biotheor; 2005; 53(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 16583273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
