These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15382218)

  • 1. Overview of the MELD/PELD system of liver allocation indications for liver transplantation in the MELD era: evidence-based patient selection.
    Freeman RB
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S2-3. PubMed ID: 15382218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of pediatric candidates under the PELD system.
    McDiarmid SV; Merion RM; Dykstra DM; Harper AM
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S23-30. PubMed ID: 15384170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Organ allocation for liver-intestine candidates.
    Horslen S
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S86-9. PubMed ID: 15382223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of candidates with HCC for transplantation in the MELD era.
    Sala M; Varela M; Bruix J
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S4-9. PubMed ID: 15382217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a continuous disease severity score to the OPTN liver waiting list.
    Edwards EB; Harper AM
    Clin Transpl; 2001; ():19-24. PubMed ID: 12211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When is a patient too well and when is a patient too sick for a liver transplant?
    Merion RM
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S69-73. PubMed ID: 15382215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.
    Wiesner RH; McDiarmid SV; Kamath PS; Edwards EB; Malinchoc M; Kremers WK; Krom RA; Kim WR
    Liver Transpl; 2001 Jul; 7(7):567-80. PubMed ID: 11460223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MELD-based allocation scheme for liver transplantation in Israel.
    Onaca N; Mor E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Sep; 8(9):651-2. PubMed ID: 17058421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does MELD work for relisted candidates?
    Edwards E; Harper A
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S10-6. PubMed ID: 15382287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National and regional analysis of exceptions to the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scoring system (2003-2004).
    Shneider BL; Suchy FJ; Emre S
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Jan; 12(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16382460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summary report of a national conference: Evolving concepts in liver allocation in the MELD and PELD era. December 8, 2003, Washington, DC, USA.
    Olthoff KM; Brown RS; Delmonico FL; Freeman RB; McDiarmid SV; Merion RM; Millis JM; Roberts JP; Shaked A; Wiesner RH; Lucey MR
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):A6-22. PubMed ID: 15382225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liver transplantation in the era of model for end-stage liver disease.
    Wang VS; Saab S
    Liver Int; 2004 Feb; 24(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15101994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates].
    Colmenero J; Castro-Narro G; Navasa M
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 19631411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in United States veterans.
    Ahmad J; Downey KK; Akoad M; Cacciarelli TV
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Nov; 13(11):1564-9. PubMed ID: 17969210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How will patients be selected for transplantation in the future?
    Lucey MR
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S90-2. PubMed ID: 15382224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new priority policy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation within the model for end-stage liver disease system.
    Piscaglia F; Camaggi V; Ravaioli M; Grazi GL; Zanello M; Leoni S; Ballardini G; Cavrini G; Pinna AD; Bolondi L
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Jun; 13(6):857-66. PubMed ID: 17539006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overview of the MELD score and the UNOS adult liver allocation system.
    Martin AP; Bartels M; Hauss J; Fangmann J
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3169-74. PubMed ID: 18089345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of MELD on OPTN liver allocation: preliminary results.
    Edwards EB; Harper AM
    Clin Transpl; 2002; ():21-8. PubMed ID: 12971434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retransplantation for recurrent hepatitis C in the MELD era: maximizing utility.
    Burton JR; Sonnenberg A; Rosen HR
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S59-64. PubMed ID: 15382221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liver transplant recipient selection: MELD vs. clinical judgment.
    Fink MA; Angus PW; Gow PJ; Berry SR; Wang BZ; Muralidharan V; Christophi C; Jones RM
    Liver Transpl; 2005 Jun; 11(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 15915491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.