These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15382723)

  • 1. A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking.
    Field KG; Chern EC; Dick LK; Fuhrman J; Griffith J; Holden PA; LaMontagne MG; Le J; Olson B; Simonich MT
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):181-94. PubMed ID: 15382723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples.
    Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; McGee CD
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
    Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
    Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.
    Myoda SP; Carson CA; Fuhrmann JJ; Hahm BK; Hartel PG; Yampara-Lquise H; Johnson L; Kuntz RL; Nakatsu CH; Sadowsky MJ; Samadpour M
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 15382722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of viral pathogens and indicators to differentiate between human and non-human fecal contamination in a microbial source tracking comparison study.
    Noble RT; Allen SM; Blackwood AD; Chu W; Jiang SC; Lovelace GL; Sobsey MD; Stewart JR; Wait DA
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):195-207. PubMed ID: 15382724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
    Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces.
    Silkie SS; Nelson KL
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach.
    Kildare BJ; Leutenegger CM; McSwain BS; Bambic DG; Rajal VB; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3701-15. PubMed ID: 17644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
    Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.
    Gourmelon M; Caprais MP; Ségura R; Le Mennec C; Lozach S; Piriou JY; Rincé A
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 73(15):4857-66. PubMed ID: 17557850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation and field testing of library-independent microbial source tracking methods in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Harwood VJ; Brownell M; Wang S; Lepo J; Ellender RD; Ajidahun A; Hellein KN; Kennedy E; Ye X; Flood C
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4812-9. PubMed ID: 19595426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Converse RR; Blackwood AD; Kirs M; Griffith JF; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4828-37. PubMed ID: 19631958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Qualitative and quantitative estimation of host-specific fecal pollution using Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers by T-RFLP and real-time PCR analyses.
    Savichtcheva O; Okabe S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 19448320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fecal source tracking, the indicator paradigm, and managing water quality.
    Field KG; Samadpour M
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3517-38. PubMed ID: 17643471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.
    Boehm AB; Van De Werfhorst LC; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA; Shanks OC; Wang D; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6812-28. PubMed ID: 23880218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
    Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.