365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15382775)
1. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
Davis DM; Packer ME
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
Walton JN
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
