These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15382775)
1. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study. ELsyad MA Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results. Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Davis DM; Packer ME Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare. Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol. Walton JN Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Celik G; Uludag B J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance. Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]