240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15382805)
1. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcome and cost efficiency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in transtibial amputees.
Selles RW; Janssens PJ; Jongenengel CD; Bussmann JB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 86(1):154-61; quiz 180. PubMed ID: 15641007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape in a Developing Country: A study to compare initial outcomes in Pressure Cast hydrostatic and Patella Tendon Bearing designs.
Laing S; Lythgo N; Lavranos J; Lee PVS
Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():363-368. PubMed ID: 28869901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A photoelastic clinical study of the static load distribution at the stump/socket interface of PTB sockets.
Sewell P; Vinney J; Noroozi S; Amali R; Andrews S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 16466158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee.
Convery P; Buis AW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 9881607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study between patellar-tendon-bearing and pressure cast prosthetic sockets.
Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 May; 41(3B):491-501. PubMed ID: 15543467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect on gait and socket comfort in unilateral trans-tibial amputees after exchange to a polyurethane concept.
Aström I; Stenström A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Apr; 28(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15171575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Walking in a vacuum-assisted socket shifts the stump fluid balance.
Goswami J; Lynn R; Street G; Harlander M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 14571940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket.
Convery P; Buis AW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10493137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interface pressure profile analysis for patellar tendon-bearing socket and hydrostatic socket.
Moo EK; Osman NA; Pingguan-Murphy B; Abas WA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 20405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Socket Interface Pressure and Amputee Reported Outcomes for Comfortable and Uncomfortable Conditions of Patellar Tendon Bearing Socket: A Pilot Study.
Safari MR; Tafti N; Aminian G
Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):24-31; quiz 32-3. PubMed ID: 26132222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure casting technique for transtibial prosthetic socket fit in developing countries.
Lee PV; Lythgo N; Laing S; Lavranos J; Thanh NH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 24805897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
Baars EC; Geertzen JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait.
Hong JH; Mun MS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
