116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1538428)
1. Potential for inter-observer and intra-observer variability in x-ray review to establish stone-free rates after lithotripsy.
Jewett MA; Bombardier C; Caron D; Ryan MR; Gray RR; St Louis EL; Witchell SJ; Kumra S; Psihramis KE
J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 1538428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison of plain abdominal radiography with conventional and digital renal tomography in assessing renal extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.
Sacks EM; Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Drach GW; Gaines JA; Claypool HR; Clinger NJ; Fillmore DJ; Hunt KR; Pond GD
J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1341-6. PubMed ID: 2231921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.
Denstedt JD; Clayman RV; Picus DD
J Urol; 1991 Apr; 145(4):703-5. PubMed ID: 2005682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnosis of obstruction and stone passage following ESWL therapy (extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy)].
Vorwerk D; Auffermann W; Fischer N
Rofo; 1987 Sep; 147(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 2823335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.
Lee HY; Yang YH; Lee YL; Shen JT; Jang MY; Shih PM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Juan YS
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 25975631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Carr LK; D'A Honey J; Jewett MA; Ibanez D; Ryan M; Bombardier C
J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1565-7. PubMed ID: 8627823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy.
Lin CC; Hsu YS; Chen KK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Oct; 71(10):496-501. PubMed ID: 18955183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Ruggera L; Beltrami P; Ballario R; Cavalleri S; Cazzoletti L; Artibani W
Int J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 15985072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones.
Beck EM; Riehle RA
J Urol; 1991 Jan; 145(1):6-9; discussion 9-10. PubMed ID: 1984100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?
Danuser H; Müller R; Descoeudres B; Dobry E; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 17400366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experience of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for the urolithiasis in horseshoe kidney].
Ohyama A; Asai Y; Ameno Y; Sakakura T; Sugita O; Kamizuru M; Sakamoto W; Nakatani T; Kishimoto T; Maekawa M
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1991 Dec; 37(12):1627-31. PubMed ID: 1785385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.?
Gofrit ON; Pode D; Meretyk S; Katz G; Shapiro A; Golijanin D; Wiener DP; Shenfeld OZ; Landau EH
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1862-4. PubMed ID: 11586249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.
Poulakis V; Dahm P; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Remplik J; Becht E
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1250-6. PubMed ID: 12629337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple objective method to assess the radiopacity of urinary calculi and its use to predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes.
el-Gamal O; el-Badry A
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):343-7. PubMed ID: 19447433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL).
Küpeli B; Gürocak S; Tunç L; Senocak C; Karaoğlan U; Bozkirli I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2005; 37(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 16142547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 1,000 patients. Toronto Lithotripsy Associates.
Psihramis KE; Jewett MA; Bombardier C; Caron D; Ryan M
J Urol; 1992 Apr; 147(4):1006-9. PubMed ID: 1552574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
