These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1538490)

  • 1. Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach.
    Frazier HA; Robertson JE; Paulson DF
    J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):888-90. PubMed ID: 1538490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.
    Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
    J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
    Haab F; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L; Toublanc M
    Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 7530127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center.
    Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; Zaki S; Vordos D; Cicco A; Olsson LE; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):104-10; discussion 110-1. PubMed ID: 12160579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy.
    Parra RO; Boullier JA; Rauscher JA; Cummings JM
    J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1599-602. PubMed ID: 8189572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gillitzer R; Thüroff JW
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2002 Aug; 43(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 12191739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?
    Korman HJ; Leu PB; Huang RR; Goldstein NS
    J Urol; 2002 Sep; 168(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 12187206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
    Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the narrow operating field in perineal radical prostatectomy lead to more positive surgical margins?
    Shalev M; Tykochinsky G; Richter S; Kessler OJ; Nissenkorn I
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1998 Aug; 24(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 9725000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Radical prostatectomy: comparison of the perineal and retropubic route (40 patients). Preliminary results].
    Doublet JD; Lagrange L; Ciofu C; Thibault P; Gattegno B
    Prog Urol; 1994 Feb; 4(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 8186791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radical perineal prostatectomy].
    Petrov SB; Korol' VD
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2005; 164(6):78-81. PubMed ID: 16792322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
    May M; Dorst M; May J; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
    Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perineal radical prostatectomy in the age of laparoscopy].
    Parra RO; Laguna Pes MP; García Pérez M; Isorna de la Riva S
    Arch Esp Urol; 1993 Dec; 46(10):879-8; discussion 885-6. PubMed ID: 8141619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-stage laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Thomas R; Steele R; Smith R; Brannan W
    J Urol; 1994 Oct; 152(4):1174-7. PubMed ID: 8072087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.