These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15385769)
1. Direct skeletal traction for Le Fort I halo distraction replacing an intraoral dental splint and connecting traction hook. Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Kadomatsu K; Tosa Y; Hosaka Y Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Oct; 53(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 15385769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rigid External Distraction with Intranasal Bone-borne Traction Hooks for Midfacial Hypoplasia. Zheng Y; Tong H; Yin N; Niu F; Zhao Z; Song T Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):9948. PubMed ID: 29967456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: modification of the intraoral splint in the rigid external distraction. Lim H; Ko EW; Lo LJ J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):856-8. PubMed ID: 22565908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous hybrid of maxillary Le Fort I halo distraction and mandibular set-back for patients with severe cleft jaw deformity. Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Tosa Y; Kadamatsu K; Hosaka Y J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):962-9. PubMed ID: 17003627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new technique for intraoral maxillary distraction: a case report. Super S; Schecter JE; Bae RD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):536-42. PubMed ID: 16487821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Distraction of Le Fort II osteotomy by intraoral distractor: a case report. Cheung LK; Lo J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 16631498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract? Fearon JA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1091-103; discussion 1104-6. PubMed ID: 11373547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Callus distraction of the mid-face in severe mid-face hypoplasia]. Hierl T; Primm T; Hemprich A Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Sep; 4 Suppl 2():S442-5. PubMed ID: 11094513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marionette traction for Le Fort I maxillary halo distraction in cleft patients. Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Kadomatsu K J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Aug; 61(8):984-6. PubMed ID: 18490212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients. Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Special distraction osteogenesis before bone grafting for alveolar cleft defects to correct maxillary deformities in patients with bilateral cleft lips and palates: distraction osteogenesis performed separately for each bone segment. Mitsukawa N; Saiga A; Morishita T; Satoh K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):623-8. PubMed ID: 24256944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple mechanism for measuring and adjusting distraction forces during maxillary advancement. Suzuki EY; Suzuki B J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2245-53. PubMed ID: 19761920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique. Dua G; Navin Kumar A; Roy ID; Roy SK J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):746-51. PubMed ID: 24777017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel anchorage technique for transnasal traction in rigid external maxillary distraction. Varol A; Basa S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e269-71. PubMed ID: 23131795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopically assisted intraoral modified Le Fort II type midfacial advancement using piezoelectric surgery and an intraoperative RED system. Hara S; Mitsugi M; Kanno T; Nomachi A; Kawakami S; Tatemoto Y J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e93-103. PubMed ID: 23351774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard? Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Uckan S; Arman A; Bayram B; Celik E J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):992-7. PubMed ID: 17003631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis. Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis. Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]