326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15386334)
1. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.
Tabar L; Tony Chen HH; Amy Yen MF; Tot T; Tung TH; Chen LS; Chiu YH; Duffy SW; Smith RA
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1745-59. PubMed ID: 15386334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumors.
Alexander MC; Yankaskas BC; Biesemier KW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16794151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Casting-type calcifications with invasion and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a more aggressive disease?
Zunzunegui RG; Chung MA; Oruwari J; Golding D; Marchant DJ; Cady B
Arch Surg; 2003 May; 138(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 12742959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study.
Tabár L; Chen HH; Duffy SW; Yen MF; Chiang CF; Dean PB; Smith RA
Lancet; 2000 Feb; 355(9202):429-33. PubMed ID: 10841122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 May; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11519866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic casting-type calcifications is not a prognostic factor in unifocal small invasive breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Månsson E; Bergkvist L; Christenson G; Persson C; Wärnberg F
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 100(8):670-4. PubMed ID: 19771563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related differences in patients with nonpalpable breast carcinomas.
Wazer DE; Gage I; Homer MJ; Krosnick SH; Schmid C
Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7):1432-7. PubMed ID: 8839548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Casting-type calcifications on the mammogram suggest a higher probability of early relapse and death among high-risk breast cancer patients.
Pálka I; Ormándi K; Gaál S; Boda K; Kahán Z
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(8):1178-83. PubMed ID: 17851833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicator?
Peacock C; Given-Wilson RM; Duffy SW
Clin Radiol; 2004 Feb; 59(2):165-70; discussion 163-4. PubMed ID: 14746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do mammographic tumor features in breast cancer relate to breast density and invasiveness, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement?
Sartor H; Borgquist S; Hartman L; Olsson Å; Jawdat F; Zackrisson S
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 24814360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.
Hayes BD; Brodie C; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 23600490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers?
Weigel S; Decker T; Korsching E; Hungermann D; Böcker W; Heindel W
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):738-45. PubMed ID: 20501713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between mammograghic findings and clinical/ pathologic features in women with small invasive breast carcinomas.
Li JN; Xu J; Wang J; Qing C; Zhao YM; Liu PF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10643-6. PubMed ID: 25605153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignant calcification is an important unfavorable prognostic factor in primary invasive breast cancer.
Ling H; Liu ZB; Xu LH; Xu XL; Liu GY; Shao ZM
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 9(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 22897789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic features are associated with clinicopathological characteristics in invasive breast cancer.
Jiang L; Ma T; Moran MS; Kong X; Li X; Haffty BG; Yang Q
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2327-34. PubMed ID: 21737659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
Thurfjell MG
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns of aggressiveness: risk of progression to invasive breast cancer by mammographic features of calcifications in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lilleborge M; Falk RS; Hovda T; Holmen MM; Ursin G; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2022 May; 63(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 33887963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer.
Mook S; Van 't Veer LJ; Rutgers EJ; Ravdin PM; van de Velde AO; van Leeuwen FE; Visser O; Schmidt MK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Apr; 103(7):585-97. PubMed ID: 21350218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
