104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15386603)
1. Improving patients' knowledge of the fetal anomaly scan.
Smith RP; Titmarsh S; Overton TG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 24(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 15386603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study.
Favre R; Duchange N; Vayssière C; Kohler M; Bouffard N; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Vayssière C; Viville B; Hervé C; Moutel G
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Mar; 27(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 17238219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.
Gourounti K; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17316936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experiences of pregnant women with information procedures in routine ultrasound examinations].
Sommerseth E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1218-20. PubMed ID: 8493650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan.
Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Gällstedt-Fransson I; Sjöden PO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 9132261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does an informational film increase women's possibility to make an informed choice about second trimester ultrasound?
Ohman SG; Björklund U; Marsk A
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Sep; 32(9):833-9. PubMed ID: 22718559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.
Brajenović-Milić B; Babić I; Ristić S; Vraneković J; Brumini G; Kapović M
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18180167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances.
Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Munk M; Svendsen L; Teisner L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 10976478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study.
Rustico MA; Mastromatteo C; Grigio M; Maggioni C; Gregori D; Nicolini U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 15849804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.
Jaques AM; Sheffield LJ; Halliday JL
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Aug; 25(8):656-64. PubMed ID: 16049990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical information and surrogate designation: results of a prospective study in elderly hospitalised patients.
Paillaud E; Ferrand E; Lejonc JL; Henry O; Bouillanne O; Montagne O
Age Ageing; 2007 May; 36(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 17261528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's perception of information and experiences of nuchal translucency screening in Greece.
Gourounti K; Lykeridou K; Daskalakis G; Glentis S; Sandall J; Antsaklis A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 18648204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. People living with HIV: sources of information on antiretroviral treatment and preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making.
Kremer H; Ironson G
Eur J Med Res; 2007 Jan; 12(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 17363356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving comprehension of informed consent.
Kusec S; Oresković S; Skegro M; Korolija D; Busić Z; Horzić M
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 16427762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.
Shorten A; Shorten B; Keogh J; West S; Morris J
Birth; 2005 Dec; 32(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 16336366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.
Watson E; Hewitson P; Brett J; Bukach C; Evans R; Edwards A; Elwyn G; Cargill A; Austoker J
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16875796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
