These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15386664)

  • 1. 'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.
    Miguel FS; Ryan M; Amaya-Amaya M
    Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 14(3):307-22. PubMed ID: 15386664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Health Econ; 2006 Aug; 15(8):797-811. PubMed ID: 16615039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.
    Ryan M; Gerard K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2003; 2(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 14619274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.
    Mangham LJ; Hanson K; McPake B
    Health Policy Plan; 2009 Mar; 24(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 19112071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses.
    Ryan M; Watson V; Entwistle V
    Health Econ; 2009 Mar; 18(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 18651601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who pays attention in stated-choice surveys?
    Ozdemir S; Mohamed AF; Johnson FR; Hauber AB
    Health Econ; 2010 Jan; 19(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19267358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?
    Lloyd AJ
    Health Econ; 2003 May; 12(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 12720256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete-choice contingent valuation.
    Yeung RY; Smith RD; Ho LM; Johnston JM; Leung GM
    Health Econ; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1077-89. PubMed ID: 16518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using willingness to pay to measure family members' preferences in mental health.
    Mulvaney-Day NE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Jun; 8(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 15998979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding consumers' preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa.
    De Allegri M; Sanon M; Bridges J; Sauerborn R
    Health Policy; 2006 Mar; 76(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 15946762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Eliciting preferences for mammography: using a discrete choice experiment approach].
    Taguchi R; Yamazaki Y; Nakayama K
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2010 Feb; 57(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 20415238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the influence of gestalt-type characteristics on preferences over lifetime health profiles.
    Oliver A
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 18378938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
    Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapersonal variation in consumer susceptibility to normative influence: toward a better understanding of brand choice decisions.
    Orth UR; Kahle LR
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):423-47. PubMed ID: 18807420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making.
    Kim S; Healey MK; Goldstein D; Hasher L; Wiprzycka UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18361652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making.
    Kalenscher T; Pennartz CM
    Prog Neurobiol; 2008 Mar; 84(3):284-315. PubMed ID: 18207301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
    Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer preferences in social health insurance.
    Kerssens JJ; Groenewegen PP
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 6(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 15452743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach to eliciting patients' preferences for palliative day care: the choice experiment method.
    Douglas HR; Normand CE; Higginson IJ; Goodwin DM
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 May; 29(5):435-45. PubMed ID: 15904746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.