These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15386678)

  • 1. Testing the internal consistency of the lottery equivalents method using health outcomes.
    Oliver A
    Health Econ; 2005 Feb; 14(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 15386678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the internal consistency of the lottery equivalents method using health outcomes: a comment to Oliver.
    Spencer A; Covey J; Chilton S; Taylor M
    Health Econ; 2005 Feb; 14(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15497199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory.
    Oliver A
    J Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 22(4):659-74. PubMed ID: 12842320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of 3 valuation methods for temporary health states in patients treated with oral anticoagulants.
    Locadia M; Stalmeier PF; Oort FJ; Prins MH; Sprangers MA; Bossuyt PM
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 15534343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysing risk attitudes to time.
    Oliver A; Cookson R
    Health Econ; 2010 Jun; 19(6):644-55. PubMed ID: 19424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do risk attitudes differ across domains and respondent types?
    Prosser LA; Wittenberg E
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 17545498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospect theory in the valuation of health.
    Moffett ML; Suarez-Almazor ME
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2005 Aug; 5(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 19807267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods.
    Spencer A
    Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):807-18. PubMed ID: 15322992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biases from omitted risk effects in standard gamble utilities.
    Pope R
    J Health Econ; 2004 Jul; 23(4):695-735. PubMed ID: 15587695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal management of high-risk T1G3 bladder cancer: a decision analysis.
    Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Fleshner NE; Jewett MA; Lopushinsky SR; Alibhai SM
    PLoS Med; 2007 Sep; 4(9):e284. PubMed ID: 17896857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decision-analytic model for early stage breast cancer: lumpectomy vs mastectomy.
    Büyükdamgaci-Alogan G; Elele T; Hayran M; Erman M; Kiliçkap S
    Neoplasma; 2008; 55(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 18348655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The healthy-years equivalents: how to measure them using the standard gamble approach.
    Mehrez A; Gafni A
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 1865782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the influence of gestalt-type characteristics on preferences over lifetime health profiles.
    Oliver A
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 18378938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The construction of standard gamble utilities.
    van Osch SM; Stiggelbout AM
    Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17410521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Person tradeoffs and the problem of risk.
    Doctor JN; Miyamoto JM
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2005 Dec; 5(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 19807610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients' utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff.
    Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Wakker PP; Vliet Vlieland TP; Leer JW; Nooy MA; Kievit J
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 10372581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing rank-dependent utility theory for health outcomes.
    Oliver A
    Health Econ; 2003 Oct; 12(10):863-71. PubMed ID: 14508870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health beliefs and expectations implicit in decision-making in a Hong Kong Chinese surgical population.
    Henderson A; Chien WT
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Mar; 16(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 17335536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.