These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15387051)

  • 1. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1127-32; quiz 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15387051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
    Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of defective amalgam restorations repaired with a resin-based composite material.
    Hopkins CE; Restrepo-Kennedy N; Elgreatly A; Comnick C; Vargas M; Teixeira EC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Feb; 154(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 36543651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth.
    Joynt RB; Wieczkowski G; Klockowski R; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Apr; 57(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 3471955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars.
    Soares CJ; Roscoe MG; Castro CG; Santana FR; Raposo LH; Quagliatto PS; Novais VR
    Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 21740445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periapical status of non-root-filled teeth with resin composite, amalgam, or full crown restorations: a cross-sectional study of a Swedish adult population.
    Dawson V; Petersson K; Wolf E; Akerman S
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25043330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A resin alternative for posterior teeth: questions and answers on dental amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Dent Update; 2003 Jun; 30(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 12861764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival Rates from Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Full-coverage Crowns or Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Retrospective Study.
    Suksaphar W; Banomyong D; Jirathanyanatt T; Ngoenwiwatkul Y
    J Endod; 2018 Feb; 44(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 29208401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
    Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.