175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15387840)
1. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R; Gaebler P
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15387840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
Dietz W; Montag R; Kraft U; Walther M; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and Micromorphologic 29-year Results of Posterior Composite Restorations.
Montag R; Dietz W; Nietzsche S; Lang T; Weich K; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
J Dent Res; 2018 Dec; 97(13):1431-1437. PubMed ID: 30067429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years.
Lundin SA; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(5-6):165-71. PubMed ID: 10901600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.
Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D
J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations.
Sakrana AA; Tanoue N; Kawasaki K; Matsumura H
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):985-90. PubMed ID: 15387839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: a three-year report.
Torres CR; Borges AB; Goncalves SE; Pucci CR; de Araujo MA; Barcellos DC
Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 20591781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
