270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15388321)
1. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
J Biomech; 2004 Nov; 37(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 15388321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear in the prosthetic shoulder: association with design parameters.
Hopkins AR; Hansen UN; Amis AA; Knight L; Taylor M; Levy O; Copeland SA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 17408327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of peg design and cement mantle thickness on pull-out strength of glenoid component pegs.
Nyffeler RW; Anglin C; Sheikh R; Gerber C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 Jul; 85(5):748-52. PubMed ID: 12892204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a caged, bone ingrowth, glenoid implant in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty technique and early results.
Grey SG
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S41-5. PubMed ID: 24328579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural analysis of an offset-keel design glenoid component compared with a center-keel design.
Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ; Resch H
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2001; 10(6):568-79. PubMed ID: 11743538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of variation of prosthesis size on cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Sep; 28(9):1055-60. PubMed ID: 7814433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components.
Budge MD; Kurdziel MD; Baker KC; Wiater JM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 May; 22(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 22999848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems.
Lacroix D; Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2000 Aug; 122(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 11036568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glenoid loosening in response to dynamic multi-axis eccentric loading: a comparison between keeled and pegged designs with an equivalent radial mismatch.
Roche C; Angibaud L; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2006; 63(3-4):88-92. PubMed ID: 16878824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Stone KD; Grabowski JJ; Cofield RH; Morrey BF; An KN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 1999; 8(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10226968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the cement mantle thickness influence the glenoid loosening in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty? An experimental study.
Clavert P; Bouchaïb J; Kling A; Kempf JF
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Jan; 24(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 30146383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis.
Couteau B; Mansat P; Estivalèzes E; Darmana R; Mansat M; Egan J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Aug; 16(7):566-75. PubMed ID: 11470298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Load transfer after cemented total shoulder arthroplasty.
Patel RJ; Wright TM; Gao Y
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Oct; 23(10):1553-62. PubMed ID: 24751532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.
Boileau P; Avidor C; Krishnan SG; Walch G; Kempf JF; Molé D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2002; 11(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 12195253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acromion-fixation of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1702-11. PubMed ID: 15958228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement.
Yian EH; Werner CM; Nyffeler RW; Pfirrmann CW; Ramappa A; Sukthankar A; Gerber C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Sep; 87(9):1928-36. PubMed ID: 16140806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
