130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15389260)
1. Telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) in situ reveals telomerase activity in three cell types in effusions: malignant cells, proliferative mesothelial cells, and lymphocytes.
Zendehrokh N; Dejmek A
Mod Pathol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 15389260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telomerase activity in effusions: a comparison between telomere repeat amplification protocol in situ and conventional telomere repeat amplification protocol assay.
Hansson M; Zendehrokh N; Ohyashiki J; Ohyashiki K; Westman UB; Roos G; Dejmek A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 132(12):1896-902. PubMed ID: 19061286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of NCL-hTERT antibody reactivity and telomere repeat amplification protocol in situ in effusions.
Zendehrokh N; Rehnberg J; Dejmek A
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18077981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in TRAP assay in routine detection of malignancy in effusions.
Braunschweig R; Guilleret I; Delacrétaz F; Bosman FT; Mihaescu A; Benhattar J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Oct; 25(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 11599105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telomerase activity analyzed with TRAP in situ provides additional information in effusions remaining equivocal after immunocytochemistry and hyaluronan analysis.
Adell E; Dejmek A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1051-7. PubMed ID: 24692425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of malignant effusions: comparison of a telomerase assay and cytologic examination.
Braunschweig R; Yan P; Guilleret I; Delacretaz F; Bosman FT; Mihaescu A; Benhattar J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 11241900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In situ telomerase activity in pleural effusions: a promising marker for malignancy.
Dejmek A; Yahata N; Ohyashiki K; Ebihara Y; Kakihana M; Hirano T; Kawate N; Kato H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11135462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of the human telomerase RNA component by in situ hybridization in cells from body fluids.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Fu E; Jan CI; Lee WH
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15717752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telomerase activity in benign and malignant cytologic fluids.
Mu XC; Brien TP; Ross JS; Lowry CV; McKenna BJ
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 10227600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytological diagnosis and telomerase activity of cells in effusions of body cavities.
Toshima S; Arai T; Yasuda Y; Takaya T; Ito Y; Hayakawa K; Shibuya C; Yoshimi N; Shibayama M; Kashiki Y
Oncol Rep; 1999; 6(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 9864428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions.
Nagel H; Schlott T; Schulz GM; Droese M
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2001 Mar; 10(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11277397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive effusion cytology as the initial presentation of malignancy.
Monte SA; Ehya H; Lang WR
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 3604540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of detection of malignancy in pleural effusions using ELISA-based TRAP assay: comparison with cytological examination.
Lee WY
Cytopathology; 2005 Oct; 16(5):227-32. PubMed ID: 16181308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of cytology in diagnosis of serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: An experience of a tertiary care center.
Patel T; Patel P; Mehta S; Shah M; Jetly D; Khanna N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Aug; 47(8):776-782. PubMed ID: 31091023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunocytochemical staining of serous effusions with the monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4.
De Angelis M; Buley ID; Heryet A; Gray W
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 1617160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential expression of CD44s and CD44v3-10 in adenocarcinoma cells and reactive mesothelial cells in effusions.
Berner HS; Davidson B; Berner A; Risberg B; Nesland JM
Virchows Arch; 2000 Apr; 436(4):330-5. PubMed ID: 10834535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Contribution of immunocytochemical marking of benign cells to the diagnosis of serous effusions].
Gaulier A; Cava E; Chosia MC; Pore G; Marsan C
Ann Pathol; 1986; 6(4-5):323-8. PubMed ID: 3814272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitive detection of tumour cells in effusions by combining cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).
Fiegl M; Massoner A; Haun M; Sturm W; Kaufmann H; Hack R; Krugmann J; Fritzer-Szekeres M; Grünewald K; Gastl G
Br J Cancer; 2004 Aug; 91(3):558-63. PubMed ID: 15226776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytohistological correlation in serous effusions using the newly proposed International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: Experience of an oncological center.
Lobo C; Costa J; Petronilho S; Monteiro P; Leça L; Schmitt F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 May; 49(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 32339444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: a review.
Das DK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 May; 34(5):335-47. PubMed ID: 16604559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
