131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15390252)
1. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system.
Van Herck PL; Gavit L; Gorissen P; Wuyts FL; Claeys MJ; Bosmans JM; Benali K; Vrints CJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 15390252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting.
Ishibashi Y; Grundeken MJ; Nakatani S; Iqbal J; Morel MA; Généreux P; Girasis C; Wentzel JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25059819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems.
Ramcharitar S; Daeman J; Patterson M; van Guens RJ; Boersma E; Serruys PW; van der Giessen WJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18098181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions.
Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Ramcharitar S; Tuinenburg JC; Reiber JH; Tu S; Aben JP; Girasis C; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V44-9. PubMed ID: 25983170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Morel MA; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2012 Mar; 7(11):1326-35. PubMed ID: 22433196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?
Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Seppenwoolde Y; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Oct; 68(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 16969851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a new system in quantitative coronary arteriography.
Svane B; Rasmundson K
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):503-7. PubMed ID: 9240667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography.
van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH
Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 8596059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club.
Girasis C; Onuma Y; Schuurbiers JC; Morel MA; van Es GA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 79(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 22072537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of QCA systems.
Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS.
Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of noninvasive coronary stenosis quantification of different commercially available dedicated software packages.
Dikkers R; Willems TP; de Jonge GJ; Marquering HA; Greuter MJ; van Ooijen PM; van der Weide MC; Oudkerk M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 19638840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative in-vitro validation of eight first- and second-generation quantitative coronary angiography systems.
Hausleiter J; Jost S; Nolte CW; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Stiel GM; Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Linderer T; Hausmann D; Schömig A
Coron Artery Dis; 1997 Feb; 8(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 9211047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification.
LeFree MT; Simon SB; Mancini GB; Bates ER; Vogel RA
Invest Radiol; 1988 Mar; 23(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3372175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
