These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15398918)

  • 1. An audit of the treatment of breast cancer at the Hartford Hospital, 1932-1939.
    WELLS DB
    Conn State Med J; 1950 Jan; 14(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 15398918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carcinoma of the male breast experience at Hartford Hospital 1930-1960.
    SMITH GV; PAINTER RW
    Hartford Hosp Bull; 1962 Mar; 17():43-50. PubMed ID: 13914239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III breast cancer: Results of the Dutch national breast cancer audit.
    Spronk PER; van Bommel ACM; Siesling S; Wouters MWJM; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Smorenburg CH
    Breast; 2017 Dec; 36():34-38. PubMed ID: 28942098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: The national NABON Breast Cancer Audit.
    van Bommel AC; Spronk PE; Vrancken Peeters MT; Jager A; Lobbes M; Maduro JH; Mureau MA; Schreuder K; Smorenburg CH; Verloop J; Westenend PJ; Wouters MW; Siesling S; Tjan-Heijnen VC; van Dalen T;
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):243-249. PubMed ID: 27885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands.
    Schreuder K; van Bommel ACM; de Ligt KM; Maduro JH; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Mureau MAM; Siesling S
    Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():96-102. PubMed ID: 28552797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological issues in the use of guidelines and audit to improve clinical effectiveness in breast cancer in one United Kingdom health region.
    Bell CM; Ma M; Campbell S; Basnett I; Pollock A; Taylor I
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Mar; 26(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 10744929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer audit: adapting national audit frameworks for local review of clinical practice.
    Reilly J; Mitchell A; Blue J; Thomson W
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Jan; 59(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 12811914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large variation between hospitals in immediate breast reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands.
    van Bommel AC; Mureau MA; Schreuder K; van Dalen T; Vrancken Peeters MT; Schrieks M; Maduro JH; Siesling S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Feb; 70(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27993547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The treatment and results in cancer of the breast at the Presbyterian Hospital, New York.
    HAAGENSEN CD
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther; 1949 Sep; 62(3):328-34; Disc., 349-54. PubMed ID: 18148518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expenditure audit of women with breast cancer in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi.
    Pakseresht S; Ingle GK; Garg S; Singh MM
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):428-37. PubMed ID: 22293256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of cancer of the breast at the Waterbury Hospital, 1931-1948.
    GEDEON P
    Conn State Med J; 1949 Sep; 13(9):840-9. PubMed ID: 18139514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer pathology reporting: an audit to compare standards with minimum datasets in a district general hospital.
    Bhatt N; Cotter MM
    Breast J; 2008; 14(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 18186880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency of breast biopsy and breast cancer diagnosis in central Connecticut--trends from 1993 to 1997.
    Ricci A; Banever T
    Conn Med; 1998 Mar; 62(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 9573651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Late-stage breast cancer in Connecticut's three largest cities.
    Polednak AP; Flannery JT
    Conn Med; 1994 May; 58(5):261-4. PubMed ID: 8076457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer of the breast; analysis of frequency, distribution, and mortality at the University of California Hospital, 1918 to 1947, inclusive.
    SHIMKIN MB; LUCIA EL; STONE RS; BELL HG
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1952 Jun; 94(6):645-61. PubMed ID: 14931173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sustainability of short stay after breast cancer surgery in early adopter hospitals.
    Ament SM; Gillissen F; Maessen JM; Dirksen CD; Bell AV; Vissers YL; van der Weijden T; von Meyenfeldt MF
    Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 24698633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: analysis of 233,247 patients.
    Guller U; Safford S; Pietrobon R; Heberer M; Oertli D; Jain NB
    World J Surg; 2005 Aug; 29(8):994-9; discussion 999-1000. PubMed ID: 15988622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The results of treatment of breast cancer at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.
    LEWISON EF
    Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum; 1959; 15():1114-31. PubMed ID: 14416565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes.
    Lee-Feldstein A; Anton-Culver H; Feldstein PJ
    JAMA; 1994 Apr; 271(15):1163-8. PubMed ID: 8151873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carcinoma of the breast; an analysis of 100 questionnaires sent to patients operated upon at Fairview Hospital.
    STELTER LA
    Minn Med; 1948 Sep; 31(9):1019-22. PubMed ID: 18885042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.