These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1539951)

  • 21. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.
    Logan GD
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Apr; 28(2):103-74. PubMed ID: 7736720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: implications for decision models.
    Williams JA
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 May; 71(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 5939705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decision-time measures of sequential processing by mentally retarded and nonretarded adolescents and MA-matched children.
    Holden EA; Corrigan JG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):640-8. PubMed ID: 6869422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Endogenous-like orienting of visual attention in rats.
    Marote CF; Xavier GF
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 21369759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The smoking Stroop and delay discounting in smokers: effects of environmental smoking cues.
    Field M; Rush M; Cole J; Goudie A
    J Psychopharmacol; 2007 Aug; 21(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 17092980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
    Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Nature; 2000 Oct; 407(6806):906-8. PubMed ID: 11057669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
    Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Green J; Ward LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DISTRIBUTION AND SEQUENCE EFFECTS IN JUDGMENT.
    PARDUCCI A; SANDUSKY A
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():450-9. PubMed ID: 14285599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. VIGILANCE CONSIDERED AS A STATISTICAL DECISION.
    BROADBENT DE; GREGORY M
    Br J Psychol; 1963 Nov; 54():309-23. PubMed ID: 14079022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coupling effects and performance in viligance tasks.
    Hatfield JL; Soderquist DR
    Hum Factors; 1970 Aug; 12(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 5458015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Manipulating the response criterion in visual monitoring.
    Williges RC
    Hum Factors; 1973 Apr; 15(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 4700446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A table of d' for a model of the unforced choice experiment.
    Taylor MM; Fraser WC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):282. PubMed ID: 5906731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction of time-uncertainty and relative signal frequency in determining choice reaction time.
    Bertelson P; Barzeele J
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Nov; 70(5):448-51. PubMed ID: 5833664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The elicited observing rate and decision processes in vigilance.
    Jerison HJ; Pickett RM; Stenson HH
    Hum Factors; 1965 Apr; 7(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 5861123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinct visual processing networks for foveal and peripheral visual fields.
    Zhang J; Zhou H; Wang S
    Commun Biol; 2024 Oct; 7(1):1259. PubMed ID: 39367101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.